The environmental concerns are behind urban and regional mobility plans, with one of the goals being to manage surface traffic to reduce emissions. Yet, at sensitive areas like around airports the contribution to the emissions generated by air traffic is commonly not considered. The research goal of this paper is to quantify and compare the magnitude of the emissions generated by both air and surface traffic, taking the second airport in Rome as an example, in the awareness that a proper knowledge of the emission phenomena might help steering local transport policies to-wards more appropriate and sustainable solutions. The paper describes the case study’s regula-tory and land use frameworks both affecting the current traffic patterns around the airport and the emission generation, along with the methodology adopted to quantify the emission magni-tude of both air and surface modes; as a result, air traffic emissions are not even comparable in magnitude to those from surface modes. In the light of that, implications for surface transport policies are presented, leading to a revision of current mobility plans, and solutions to minimize emissions during land and take-off operations suggested, although problems for their implemen-tations are acknowledged in conclusions. All within the additional goal to advance the research farther afield.

Airports As Sensitive Areas to Mitigate Air Pollution. Evidence from a Case Study in Rome / Corazza, MARIA VITTORIA; DI MASCIO, Paola; Esposito, Gabriele. - In: ENVIRONMENTS. - ISSN 2076-3298. - 9:9(2022). [10.3390/environments9090108]

Airports As Sensitive Areas to Mitigate Air Pollution. Evidence from a Case Study in Rome

Maria Vittoria Corazza
Primo
;
Paola Di Mascio
Secondo
;
2022

Abstract

The environmental concerns are behind urban and regional mobility plans, with one of the goals being to manage surface traffic to reduce emissions. Yet, at sensitive areas like around airports the contribution to the emissions generated by air traffic is commonly not considered. The research goal of this paper is to quantify and compare the magnitude of the emissions generated by both air and surface traffic, taking the second airport in Rome as an example, in the awareness that a proper knowledge of the emission phenomena might help steering local transport policies to-wards more appropriate and sustainable solutions. The paper describes the case study’s regula-tory and land use frameworks both affecting the current traffic patterns around the airport and the emission generation, along with the methodology adopted to quantify the emission magni-tude of both air and surface modes; as a result, air traffic emissions are not even comparable in magnitude to those from surface modes. In the light of that, implications for surface transport policies are presented, leading to a revision of current mobility plans, and solutions to minimize emissions during land and take-off operations suggested, although problems for their implemen-tations are acknowledged in conclusions. All within the additional goal to advance the research farther afield.
2022
air emissions; airports; aviation; car traffic; environment
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Airports As Sensitive Areas to Mitigate Air Pollution. Evidence from a Case Study in Rome / Corazza, MARIA VITTORIA; DI MASCIO, Paola; Esposito, Gabriele. - In: ENVIRONMENTS. - ISSN 2076-3298. - 9:9(2022). [10.3390/environments9090108]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Corazza_Airports-as_sensitive-areas_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1652428
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact