Area of habitat (AOH) is a deductive model which maps the distribution of suitable habitats at suitable alti- tudes for a species inside its broad geographical range. The AOH maps have been validated using presence-only data for small subsets of species for different taxonomic groups, but no standard validation method exists when absence data are not available. We develop a novel two-step validation pro- tocol for AOH which includes first a model-based evalua- tion of model prevalence (i.e, the proportion of suitable habi- tat within a species’ range), and second a validation using species point localities (presence-only) data. We applied the protocol to AOH maps of terrestrial birds and mammals. In the first step we built logistic regression models to predict ex- pected model prevalence (the proportion of the range retained as AOH) as a function of each species’ elevation range, mid- point of elevation range, number of habitats, realm and, for birds, seasonality. AOH maps with large differences between observed and predicted model prevalence were identified as outliers and used to identify a number of sources of system- atic error which were then corrected when possible. For the corrected AOH, only 1.7 % of AOH maps for birds and 2.3 % of AOH maps for mammals were flagged as outliers in terms of the difference between their observed and predicted model prevalence. In the second step we calculated point preva- lence, the proportion of point localities of a species falling in pixels coded as suitable in the AOH map. We used 48 336 141 point localities for 4889 bird species and 107 061 point lo- calities for 420 mammals. Where point prevalence exceeded model prevalence, the AOH was a better reflection of species’ distribution than random selection. We also found that 4689 out of 4889 (95.9 %) AOH maps for birds, and 399 out of 420 (95.0 %) AOH maps for mammals were better than ran- dom. Possible reasons for the poor performance of a small proportion of AOH maps are discussed.

A validation standard for area of habitat maps for terrestrial birds and mammals / Dahal, PRABHAT RAJ; LUMBIERRES CIVIT, Maria; Butchart, Stuart H. M.; Donald, Paul F.; Rondinini, Carlo. - In: GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 1991-9603. - 15:(2022). [10.5194/gmd-15-5093-2022]

A validation standard for area of habitat maps for terrestrial birds and mammals

Prabhat Raj Dahal
Primo
;
Maria Lumbierres;Carlo Rondinini
Ultimo
2022

Abstract

Area of habitat (AOH) is a deductive model which maps the distribution of suitable habitats at suitable alti- tudes for a species inside its broad geographical range. The AOH maps have been validated using presence-only data for small subsets of species for different taxonomic groups, but no standard validation method exists when absence data are not available. We develop a novel two-step validation pro- tocol for AOH which includes first a model-based evalua- tion of model prevalence (i.e, the proportion of suitable habi- tat within a species’ range), and second a validation using species point localities (presence-only) data. We applied the protocol to AOH maps of terrestrial birds and mammals. In the first step we built logistic regression models to predict ex- pected model prevalence (the proportion of the range retained as AOH) as a function of each species’ elevation range, mid- point of elevation range, number of habitats, realm and, for birds, seasonality. AOH maps with large differences between observed and predicted model prevalence were identified as outliers and used to identify a number of sources of system- atic error which were then corrected when possible. For the corrected AOH, only 1.7 % of AOH maps for birds and 2.3 % of AOH maps for mammals were flagged as outliers in terms of the difference between their observed and predicted model prevalence. In the second step we calculated point preva- lence, the proportion of point localities of a species falling in pixels coded as suitable in the AOH map. We used 48 336 141 point localities for 4889 bird species and 107 061 point lo- calities for 420 mammals. Where point prevalence exceeded model prevalence, the AOH was a better reflection of species’ distribution than random selection. We also found that 4689 out of 4889 (95.9 %) AOH maps for birds, and 399 out of 420 (95.0 %) AOH maps for mammals were better than ran- dom. Possible reasons for the poor performance of a small proportion of AOH maps are discussed.
2022
distribution range; habitat suitability models; IUCN Red List
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A validation standard for area of habitat maps for terrestrial birds and mammals / Dahal, PRABHAT RAJ; LUMBIERRES CIVIT, Maria; Butchart, Stuart H. M.; Donald, Paul F.; Rondinini, Carlo. - In: GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 1991-9603. - 15:(2022). [10.5194/gmd-15-5093-2022]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Dahal_Validation_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.11 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.11 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1652314
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact