The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to achieve a more inclusive, resilient, safe and sustainable so ciety. Policy makers, together with entrepreneurs and citizens, are called to a great challenge to optimize land use. This work, through a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), aims at comparing the sustainability of 103 Italian cities through the evaluation of 45 SDGs’ indicators, ranking cities on the base of their performance. Results show strong disparities across Italy with three northern cities at the top of the ranking and many southern cities at the bottom. The analysis then creates a framework based on experts’ view composed of 21 criteria that would facilitate the development of a sustainability plan. A hybrid methodology based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the 10-point scale is used to rank among the criteria. Selected experts underlined how sus tainable policy and green investment are enabling factors of sustainable cities, but political stability and streamlined public spending are also essential to achieve this goal. The analysis offers insights for different categories of stakeholders and invites to measure and monitor the progress of cities towards SDGs proposing eight directions (policy, economy, operations, environment, organization, staff, society and human)

An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities. Performance measurements and policy implications / D'Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Ioppolo, G.; Morone, P.. - In: LAND USE POLICY. - ISSN 0264-8377. - 120:(2022), p. 106278. [10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106278]

An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities. Performance measurements and policy implications

D'Adamo I.
;
Morone P.
2022

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to achieve a more inclusive, resilient, safe and sustainable so ciety. Policy makers, together with entrepreneurs and citizens, are called to a great challenge to optimize land use. This work, through a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), aims at comparing the sustainability of 103 Italian cities through the evaluation of 45 SDGs’ indicators, ranking cities on the base of their performance. Results show strong disparities across Italy with three northern cities at the top of the ranking and many southern cities at the bottom. The analysis then creates a framework based on experts’ view composed of 21 criteria that would facilitate the development of a sustainability plan. A hybrid methodology based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the 10-point scale is used to rank among the criteria. Selected experts underlined how sus tainable policy and green investment are enabling factors of sustainable cities, but political stability and streamlined public spending are also essential to achieve this goal. The analysis offers insights for different categories of stakeholders and invites to measure and monitor the progress of cities towards SDGs proposing eight directions (policy, economy, operations, environment, organization, staff, society and human)
2022
hybrid methodology; multi-criteria analysis; SDGs; sustainable policy; sustainable cities
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities. Performance measurements and policy implications / D'Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Ioppolo, G.; Morone, P.. - In: LAND USE POLICY. - ISSN 0264-8377. - 120:(2022), p. 106278. [10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106278]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
D'Adamo_Analysis_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.14 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1651746
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact