Objectives Evidence showed that, even in high-income countries, children and adolescents may not receive high quality of care (QOC). We describe the development and initial validation, in Italy, of two WHO standards-based questionnaires to conduct an assessment of QOC for children and young adolescents at inpatient level, based on the provider and user perspectives. Design Multiphase, mixed-methods study. Setting, participants and methods The two questionnaires were developed in four phases equally conducted for each tool. Phase 1 which included the prioritisation of the WHO Quality Measures according to predefined criteria and the development of the draft questionnaires. In phase 2 content face validation of the draft questionnaires was assessed among both experts and end-users. In phase 3 the optimised questionnaires were field tested to assess acceptability, perceived utility and comprehensiveness (N=163 end-users). In phase 4 intrarater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated (N=170 and N=301 end-users, respectively). Results The final questionnaires included 150 WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was excellent (kappa value of 1). The field test resulted in response rates of 98% and 76% for service users and health providers, respectively. Among respondents, 96.9% service users and 90.4% providers rated the questionnaires as useful, and 86.9% and 93.9%, respectively rated them as comprehensive. Intrarater reliability was good, with Cohen's kappa values exceeding 0.70. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency. Conclusions Study findings suggest these tools developed have good content and face validity, high acceptability and perceived utility, and good intrarater reliability and internal consistency, and therefore could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar contexts. Priority areas for future research include how tools measuring paediatric QOC can be more effectively used to help health professionals provide the best possible care.

WHO standards-based tools to measure service providers' and service users' views on the quality of hospital child care: Development and validation in Italy / Lazzerini, M.; Mariani, I.; De Melo E Lima, T. R.; Felici, E.; Martelossi, S.; Lubrano, R.; Lucarelli, A.; Trobia, G. L.; Cogo, P.; Peri, F.; Nistico, D.; Were, W. M.; Baltag, V.; Muzigaba, M.; Barbi, E.. - In: BMJ OPEN. - ISSN 2044-6055. - 12:3(2022), pp. 1-10. [10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052115]

WHO standards-based tools to measure service providers' and service users' views on the quality of hospital child care: Development and validation in Italy

Lubrano R.;
2022

Abstract

Objectives Evidence showed that, even in high-income countries, children and adolescents may not receive high quality of care (QOC). We describe the development and initial validation, in Italy, of two WHO standards-based questionnaires to conduct an assessment of QOC for children and young adolescents at inpatient level, based on the provider and user perspectives. Design Multiphase, mixed-methods study. Setting, participants and methods The two questionnaires were developed in four phases equally conducted for each tool. Phase 1 which included the prioritisation of the WHO Quality Measures according to predefined criteria and the development of the draft questionnaires. In phase 2 content face validation of the draft questionnaires was assessed among both experts and end-users. In phase 3 the optimised questionnaires were field tested to assess acceptability, perceived utility and comprehensiveness (N=163 end-users). In phase 4 intrarater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated (N=170 and N=301 end-users, respectively). Results The final questionnaires included 150 WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was excellent (kappa value of 1). The field test resulted in response rates of 98% and 76% for service users and health providers, respectively. Among respondents, 96.9% service users and 90.4% providers rated the questionnaires as useful, and 86.9% and 93.9%, respectively rated them as comprehensive. Intrarater reliability was good, with Cohen's kappa values exceeding 0.70. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency. Conclusions Study findings suggest these tools developed have good content and face validity, high acceptability and perceived utility, and good intrarater reliability and internal consistency, and therefore could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar contexts. Priority areas for future research include how tools measuring paediatric QOC can be more effectively used to help health professionals provide the best possible care.
2022
epidemiology; paediatrics; quality in health care; Adolescent; Child; Hospitals; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; World Health Organization; Child Care; Quality of Health Care
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
WHO standards-based tools to measure service providers' and service users' views on the quality of hospital child care: Development and validation in Italy / Lazzerini, M.; Mariani, I.; De Melo E Lima, T. R.; Felici, E.; Martelossi, S.; Lubrano, R.; Lucarelli, A.; Trobia, G. L.; Cogo, P.; Peri, F.; Nistico, D.; Were, W. M.; Baltag, V.; Muzigaba, M.; Barbi, E.. - In: BMJ OPEN. - ISSN 2044-6055. - 12:3(2022), pp. 1-10. [10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052115]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lazzerini_who-standards-based_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Lazzerini_who-standards-based_2022
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 441.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
441.54 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1651558
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact