Abstract Not all black swans are black in the same way: they may be unpredictable events in kind, or they may simply be unpredicted by certain actors in a certain context. In this line, a case is the COVID-19 pandemic where previous experiences of virus diffusion had been scientifically studied and a protocol of emergency action even produced by the World Health Organization. Then, why do these events were not detected? This implies a distinction between improbable but imaginable events and unimaginable events. When facing deep changes, socio-economic systems orient their response towards the normative sediment that constitutes social genotypic memory. While this reduces uncertainty, it also activates constraints that normalize change. This normalization does not have an unambiguous outcome: crazy systems may be resilient as well. This premised, is still possible to assign to resilience the role in the creation and spreading of new knowledge it had? By drawing on the literature on resilience, crazy systems and robust-yet-fragile systems and analyzing the “Italian Civil Protection” case, this work is an attempt to respond to this question.

Neither backward nor forward. Understanding crazy systems resilience / La Sala, Antonio; Patrick Fuller, Ryan; Conti, Marcelo Enrique. - (2022), pp. 1339-1352. ( IFKAD. 2022 - Knowledge drivers for resilience and transformation Lugano ).

Neither backward nor forward. Understanding crazy systems resilience

Antonio La Sala
;
Marcelo Enrique Conti
2022

Abstract

Abstract Not all black swans are black in the same way: they may be unpredictable events in kind, or they may simply be unpredicted by certain actors in a certain context. In this line, a case is the COVID-19 pandemic where previous experiences of virus diffusion had been scientifically studied and a protocol of emergency action even produced by the World Health Organization. Then, why do these events were not detected? This implies a distinction between improbable but imaginable events and unimaginable events. When facing deep changes, socio-economic systems orient their response towards the normative sediment that constitutes social genotypic memory. While this reduces uncertainty, it also activates constraints that normalize change. This normalization does not have an unambiguous outcome: crazy systems may be resilient as well. This premised, is still possible to assign to resilience the role in the creation and spreading of new knowledge it had? By drawing on the literature on resilience, crazy systems and robust-yet-fragile systems and analyzing the “Italian Civil Protection” case, this work is an attempt to respond to this question.
2022
IFKAD. 2022 - Knowledge drivers for resilience and transformation
resilience; crazy systems; RYF systems; black swans; sensemaking
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Neither backward nor forward. Understanding crazy systems resilience / La Sala, Antonio; Patrick Fuller, Ryan; Conti, Marcelo Enrique. - (2022), pp. 1339-1352. ( IFKAD. 2022 - Knowledge drivers for resilience and transformation Lugano ).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
La Sala_Neither-backward-nor-forward_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.05 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1648146
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact