This paper contributes to the academic literature on the platform society in two ways: Theoretically, we bridge the literature on the platform society with the literature on sensemaking. In particular, we take a processual approach to platform resilience as the outcome of sensemaking processes. Empirically we look at the process whereby platforms generate self-sustained users’ interest and self-promoting content in the long run. Thus, platform resilience is understood as the outcome of a sensemaking process. We frame this outcome strategically as market-place persistence and durability (attracting/maintaining users and complementors) and socially as persistence and replication of generated content, social outcomes and the narratives that platform participants may promote. New social structures in turn may reshape the platform. Such a dual sensemaking outcome shapes platform market strategy and re-shapes social structures. The two outcomes are connected but not necessarily convergent. A platform might not be strategically resilient but the narratives that platform participants may promote might resist and shape the societal debate in the long run and vice versa. We set out our argument by assessing evidence from two case studies, namely Facebook and Airbnb.
Digital Platforms Resilience: A Sensemaking Issue / Maielli, Giuliano; Iandolo, Francesca; La Sala, Antonio; Laudando, Antonio. - (2022), pp. 1106-1123. (Intervento presentato al convegno 17th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD 2022), Knowledge Drivers for Resilience and Transformation tenutosi a Lugano, Switzerland).
Digital Platforms Resilience: A Sensemaking Issue
Francesca Iandolo;Antonio La Sala
;Antonio Laudando
2022
Abstract
This paper contributes to the academic literature on the platform society in two ways: Theoretically, we bridge the literature on the platform society with the literature on sensemaking. In particular, we take a processual approach to platform resilience as the outcome of sensemaking processes. Empirically we look at the process whereby platforms generate self-sustained users’ interest and self-promoting content in the long run. Thus, platform resilience is understood as the outcome of a sensemaking process. We frame this outcome strategically as market-place persistence and durability (attracting/maintaining users and complementors) and socially as persistence and replication of generated content, social outcomes and the narratives that platform participants may promote. New social structures in turn may reshape the platform. Such a dual sensemaking outcome shapes platform market strategy and re-shapes social structures. The two outcomes are connected but not necessarily convergent. A platform might not be strategically resilient but the narratives that platform participants may promote might resist and shape the societal debate in the long run and vice versa. We set out our argument by assessing evidence from two case studies, namely Facebook and Airbnb.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.