Background: The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Bariatric Guidelines Group identified a gap in bariatric surgery recommendations with a structured, contextualized consideration of multiple bariatric interventions. Objective: To provide evidence-informed, transparent and trustworthy recommendations on the use of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, gastric plication, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, one anastomosis gastric bypass, and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in patients with severe obesity and metabolic diseases. Only laparoscopic procedures in adults were considered. Methods: A European interdisciplinary panel including general surgeons, obesity physicians, anesthetists, a psychologist and a patient representative informed outcome importance and minimal important differences. We conducted a systematic review and frequentist fixed and random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) using the graph theory approach for each outcome. We calculated the odds ratio or the (standardized) mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the CINeMA and GRADE methodologies. We considered the risk/benefit outcomes within a GRADE evidence to decision framework to arrive at recommendations, which were validated through an anonymous Delphi process of the panel. Results: We identified 43 records reporting on 24 RCTs. Most network information surrounded sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Under consideration of the certainty of the evidence and evidence to decision parameters, we suggest sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over adjustable gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and gastric plication for the management of severe obesity and associated metabolic diseases. One anastomosis gastric bypass and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are suggested as alternatives, although evidence on benefits and harms, and specific selection criteria is limited compared to sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries and decision aids in user friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/Lpv2kE Conclusions: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, pertinent recommendations on the use of bariatric and metabolic surgery for the management of severe obesity and metabolic diseases. The guideline replaces relevant recommendations published in the EAES Bariatric Guidelines 2020.

EAES rapid guideline. Systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery–extension 2022 / Carrano, F. M.; Iossa, A.; Di Lorenzo, N.; Silecchia, G.; Kontouli, K. -M.; Mavridis, D.; Alarcon, I.; Felsenreich, D. M.; Sanchez-Cordero, S.; Di Vincenzo, A.; Balague-Ponz, M. C.; Batterham, R. L.; Bouvy, N.; Copaescu, C.; Dicker, D.; Fried, M.; Godoroja, D.; Goitein, D.; Halford, J. C. G.; Kalogridaki, M.; De Luca, M.; Morales-Conde, S.; Prager, G.; Pucci, A.; Vilallonga, R.; Zani, I.; Vandvik, P. O.; Antoniou, S. A.; Agresta, F.; Azran, C.; Busetto, L.; Buza, M.; Prats, B. G.; Herlesova, J.; Piatto, G.; Pruijssers, S.; Rayman, S.; Romano, E.. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 36:3(2022), pp. 1709-1725. [10.1007/s00464-022-09008-0]

EAES rapid guideline. Systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery–extension 2022

Carrano F. M.;Iossa A.;Silecchia G.
Investigation
;
2022

Abstract

Background: The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Bariatric Guidelines Group identified a gap in bariatric surgery recommendations with a structured, contextualized consideration of multiple bariatric interventions. Objective: To provide evidence-informed, transparent and trustworthy recommendations on the use of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, gastric plication, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, one anastomosis gastric bypass, and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in patients with severe obesity and metabolic diseases. Only laparoscopic procedures in adults were considered. Methods: A European interdisciplinary panel including general surgeons, obesity physicians, anesthetists, a psychologist and a patient representative informed outcome importance and minimal important differences. We conducted a systematic review and frequentist fixed and random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) using the graph theory approach for each outcome. We calculated the odds ratio or the (standardized) mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the CINeMA and GRADE methodologies. We considered the risk/benefit outcomes within a GRADE evidence to decision framework to arrive at recommendations, which were validated through an anonymous Delphi process of the panel. Results: We identified 43 records reporting on 24 RCTs. Most network information surrounded sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Under consideration of the certainty of the evidence and evidence to decision parameters, we suggest sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over adjustable gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and gastric plication for the management of severe obesity and associated metabolic diseases. One anastomosis gastric bypass and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are suggested as alternatives, although evidence on benefits and harms, and specific selection criteria is limited compared to sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries and decision aids in user friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/Lpv2kE Conclusions: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, pertinent recommendations on the use of bariatric and metabolic surgery for the management of severe obesity and metabolic diseases. The guideline replaces relevant recommendations published in the EAES Bariatric Guidelines 2020.
2022
AGREE II; bariatric surgery; CINeMA; EAES; GRADE; guidelines; metabolic surgery; severe obesity; adult; consensus;GRADE approach; gastrectomy; humans; motion pictures; network meta-analysis; treatment outcome; bariatric surgery; gastric bypass; laparoscopy; obesity, morbid
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
EAES rapid guideline. Systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery–extension 2022 / Carrano, F. M.; Iossa, A.; Di Lorenzo, N.; Silecchia, G.; Kontouli, K. -M.; Mavridis, D.; Alarcon, I.; Felsenreich, D. M.; Sanchez-Cordero, S.; Di Vincenzo, A.; Balague-Ponz, M. C.; Batterham, R. L.; Bouvy, N.; Copaescu, C.; Dicker, D.; Fried, M.; Godoroja, D.; Goitein, D.; Halford, J. C. G.; Kalogridaki, M.; De Luca, M.; Morales-Conde, S.; Prager, G.; Pucci, A.; Vilallonga, R.; Zani, I.; Vandvik, P. O.; Antoniou, S. A.; Agresta, F.; Azran, C.; Busetto, L.; Buza, M.; Prats, B. G.; Herlesova, J.; Piatto, G.; Pruijssers, S.; Rayman, S.; Romano, E.. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 36:3(2022), pp. 1709-1725. [10.1007/s00464-022-09008-0]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Carrano_EAES_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-022-09008-0
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 704.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
704.53 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1643254
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact