Background: Up- and/or downgrading rates in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core are unknown. Methods: We identified single intermediate-risk (Gleason grade group (GGG) 2/GGG3) positive biopsy core prostate cancer patients (≤ cT2c and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). Subsequently, separate uni- and multivariable logistic regression models tested for independent predictors of up- and downgrading. Results: Of 1,328 assessable patients with single core positive intermediate-risk prostate cancer at biopsy, 972 (73%) harbored GGG2 versus 356 (27%) harbored GGG3. Median PSA (5.5 vs 5.7; p = 0.3), median age (62 vs 63 years; p = 0.07) and cT1-stage (77 vs 75%; p = 0.3) did not differ between GGG2 and GGG3 patients. Of individuals with single GGG2 positive biopsy core, 191 (20%) showed downgrading to GGG1 versus 35 (4%) upgrading to GGG4 or GGG5 at RP. Of individuals with single GGG3 positive biopsy core, 36 (10%) showed downgrading to GGG1 versus 42 (12%) significant upgrading to GGG4 or GGG5 at RP. In multivariable logistic regression models, elevated PSA (10–20 ng/mL) was an independent predictor of upgrading to GGG4/GGG5 in single GGG3 positive biopsy core patients (OR:2.89; 95%-CI: 1.31–6.11; p = 0.007). Conclusion: In single GGG2 positive biopsy core patients, downgrading was four times more often recorded compared to upgrading. Conversely, in single GGG3 positive biopsy core patients, up- and downgrading rates were comparable and should be expected in one out of ten patients.

Up- and downgrading in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core prostate cancer / Hoeh, B.; Flammia, R.; Hohenhorst, L.; Sorce, G.; Chierigo, F.; Tian, Z.; Saad, F.; Gallucci, M.; Briganti, A.; Terrone, C.; Shariat, S. F.; Graefen, M.; Tilki, D.; Kluth, L. A.; Mandel, P.; Chun, F. K. H.; Karakiewicz, P. I.. - In: PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 2287-8882. - 10:1(2022), pp. 21-27. [10.1016/j.prnil.2022.01.004]

Up- and downgrading in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core prostate cancer

Flammia R.
Secondo
;
Gallucci M.;
2022

Abstract

Background: Up- and/or downgrading rates in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core are unknown. Methods: We identified single intermediate-risk (Gleason grade group (GGG) 2/GGG3) positive biopsy core prostate cancer patients (≤ cT2c and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). Subsequently, separate uni- and multivariable logistic regression models tested for independent predictors of up- and downgrading. Results: Of 1,328 assessable patients with single core positive intermediate-risk prostate cancer at biopsy, 972 (73%) harbored GGG2 versus 356 (27%) harbored GGG3. Median PSA (5.5 vs 5.7; p = 0.3), median age (62 vs 63 years; p = 0.07) and cT1-stage (77 vs 75%; p = 0.3) did not differ between GGG2 and GGG3 patients. Of individuals with single GGG2 positive biopsy core, 191 (20%) showed downgrading to GGG1 versus 35 (4%) upgrading to GGG4 or GGG5 at RP. Of individuals with single GGG3 positive biopsy core, 36 (10%) showed downgrading to GGG1 versus 42 (12%) significant upgrading to GGG4 or GGG5 at RP. In multivariable logistic regression models, elevated PSA (10–20 ng/mL) was an independent predictor of upgrading to GGG4/GGG5 in single GGG3 positive biopsy core patients (OR:2.89; 95%-CI: 1.31–6.11; p = 0.007). Conclusion: In single GGG2 positive biopsy core patients, downgrading was four times more often recorded compared to upgrading. Conversely, in single GGG3 positive biopsy core patients, up- and downgrading rates were comparable and should be expected in one out of ten patients.
2022
downgrading; intermediate-risk; prostate cancer; single positive core biopsy; upgrading
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Up- and downgrading in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core prostate cancer / Hoeh, B.; Flammia, R.; Hohenhorst, L.; Sorce, G.; Chierigo, F.; Tian, Z.; Saad, F.; Gallucci, M.; Briganti, A.; Terrone, C.; Shariat, S. F.; Graefen, M.; Tilki, D.; Kluth, L. A.; Mandel, P.; Chun, F. K. H.; Karakiewicz, P. I.. - In: PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 2287-8882. - 10:1(2022), pp. 21-27. [10.1016/j.prnil.2022.01.004]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Hoeh_Up-downgrading-single_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.21 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1639393
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact