Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is a respiratory sleep disorder characterized by a reduction (hypopnea) in or a complete cessation (apnea) of airflow in the upper airways at night, in the presence of breathing effort. The gold standard treatment for OSA is ventilation through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), although this often shows poor patient compliance. In recent years, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been proposed as a valid surgical treatment for patients suffering from OSA in a multilevel surgical setting. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects on QoL and daytime sleepiness of multilevel surgery for OSA (barbed pharyngoplasty + transoral robotic surgery). Furthermore, we compared the impact on QoL and daytime sleepiness of two different treatments for patients with moderate to severe OSA, such as CPAP and TORS. Sixty-seven OSA patients who underwent multilevel robotic surgery and sixty-seven OSA patients treated with CPAP were enrolled, defined as Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire was administrated to evaluate the changes in the QoL. Respiratory outcomes were evaluated and compared. Group 1 showed a GBI total average value of +30.4, whereas Group 2, a value of +33.2 (p = 0.4). General benefit score showed no difference between groups (p = 0.1). Better values of social status benefit (p = 0.0006) emerged in the CPAP Group, whereas greater physical status benefit (p = 0.04) was shown in the TORS Group. Delta-AHI (−23.7 ± 14.3 vs. −31.7 ± 15.6; p = 0.001) and Delta-ODI (−24.5 ± 9.5 vs. −29.4 ± 10.5; p = 0.001) showed better values in the CPAP group. Therapeutic success rate of the Multilevel TORS Group was 73.1% and 91% in the CPAP group (p = 0.01), respectively. Multilevel TORS and CPAP have a positive effect on the quality of life of OSA patients. Greater social support has been reported in the CPAP group and better physical health status in the TORS group. No statistical difference emerged in the reduction in daytime sleepiness between both groups.

Quality of life and excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with obstructive sleep apnea who are treated with multilevel surgery or adherent to continuous positive airway pressure / Iannella, G.; Magliulo, G.; Lo Iacono, C. A. M.; Visconti, I. C.; Lechien, J. R.; Perrone, T.; Cammaroto, G.; Meccariello, G.; Maniaci, A.; Cocuzza, S.; Di Luca, M.; De Vito, A.; Martone, C.; Polimeni, A.; Greco, A.; de Vincentiis, M.; Ralli, M.; Pace, A.; Gulotta, G.; Pelucchi, S.; Eplite, A.; Vicini, C.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:9(2022). [10.3390/jcm11092375]

Quality of life and excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with obstructive sleep apnea who are treated with multilevel surgery or adherent to continuous positive airway pressure

Iannella G.
Primo
;
Magliulo G.
Secondo
;
Visconti I. C.;Polimeni A.;Greco A.;de Vincentiis M.;Ralli M.;Pace A.;Gulotta G.;
2022

Abstract

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is a respiratory sleep disorder characterized by a reduction (hypopnea) in or a complete cessation (apnea) of airflow in the upper airways at night, in the presence of breathing effort. The gold standard treatment for OSA is ventilation through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), although this often shows poor patient compliance. In recent years, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been proposed as a valid surgical treatment for patients suffering from OSA in a multilevel surgical setting. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects on QoL and daytime sleepiness of multilevel surgery for OSA (barbed pharyngoplasty + transoral robotic surgery). Furthermore, we compared the impact on QoL and daytime sleepiness of two different treatments for patients with moderate to severe OSA, such as CPAP and TORS. Sixty-seven OSA patients who underwent multilevel robotic surgery and sixty-seven OSA patients treated with CPAP were enrolled, defined as Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire was administrated to evaluate the changes in the QoL. Respiratory outcomes were evaluated and compared. Group 1 showed a GBI total average value of +30.4, whereas Group 2, a value of +33.2 (p = 0.4). General benefit score showed no difference between groups (p = 0.1). Better values of social status benefit (p = 0.0006) emerged in the CPAP Group, whereas greater physical status benefit (p = 0.04) was shown in the TORS Group. Delta-AHI (−23.7 ± 14.3 vs. −31.7 ± 15.6; p = 0.001) and Delta-ODI (−24.5 ± 9.5 vs. −29.4 ± 10.5; p = 0.001) showed better values in the CPAP group. Therapeutic success rate of the Multilevel TORS Group was 73.1% and 91% in the CPAP group (p = 0.01), respectively. Multilevel TORS and CPAP have a positive effect on the quality of life of OSA patients. Greater social support has been reported in the CPAP group and better physical health status in the TORS group. No statistical difference emerged in the reduction in daytime sleepiness between both groups.
2022
CPAP; obstructive sleep apnea; quality of life; robotic surgery; sleep studies
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Quality of life and excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with obstructive sleep apnea who are treated with multilevel surgery or adherent to continuous positive airway pressure / Iannella, G.; Magliulo, G.; Lo Iacono, C. A. M.; Visconti, I. C.; Lechien, J. R.; Perrone, T.; Cammaroto, G.; Meccariello, G.; Maniaci, A.; Cocuzza, S.; Di Luca, M.; De Vito, A.; Martone, C.; Polimeni, A.; Greco, A.; de Vincentiis, M.; Ralli, M.; Pace, A.; Gulotta, G.; Pelucchi, S.; Eplite, A.; Vicini, C.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:9(2022). [10.3390/jcm11092375]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Iannella_Quality of Life_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/9/2375
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1635975
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact