This paper deals with the need of extending results of deterministic rocking analyses to stochastic analyses on restrained masonry façades in one-sided motion. The purpose is to define the level of improvement achieved with any anti-seismic device of a given stiffness and strength, in terms of reduction of probability of exceedance of a certain limit state. The most efficient intensity measures (IMs) are identified for three masonry façades of churches in free and restrained conditions. A reliability analysis is carried out by considering over 70 earth- quakes, of which 50 recorded during the recent 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake. Four limit states are taken into account: rocking initiation, limited rocking, moderate rocking and near-collapse condition. The yielding limit state is considered for the analysis with anti-seismic devices. Univariate and bivariate fragility curves (FCs) are compared in free and restrained configurations, to discuss the reduction of probability of exceedance de- pending on 15 intensity measures. The results show that the best IMs are velocity-based parameters, in particular the Fajfar Index and Peak Ground Velocity, together with Peak Ground Acceleration. In one-sided motion without restraints, the higher the compression stiffness of the sidewalls, the more unstable the wall is in probabilistic terms. Practical curves show, for each IM, the reduction of probability of exceedance obtained thanks to assumed horizontal restraints. These help to understand, in a stochastic perspective, to what extent the anti-seismic device can be beneficial or detrimental (in case of amplifications of motion) for given earthquake intensities. The comparison of univariate and bivariate FCs confirms the superiority of bivariate FCs. Indeed, often the univariate curves sensitively underestimate the probability of exceedance, especially for low-medium intensity earthquakes, and are not able to offer any information regarding the influence of other IMs.

Fragility curves for free and restrained rocking masonry façades in one-sided motion / Giresini, L.; Casapulla, C.; Denysiuk, R.; Matos, J.; Sassu, M.. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 1873-7323. - 164:(2018), pp. 195-213. [10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.003]

Fragility curves for free and restrained rocking masonry façades in one-sided motion

L. Giresini;
2018

Abstract

This paper deals with the need of extending results of deterministic rocking analyses to stochastic analyses on restrained masonry façades in one-sided motion. The purpose is to define the level of improvement achieved with any anti-seismic device of a given stiffness and strength, in terms of reduction of probability of exceedance of a certain limit state. The most efficient intensity measures (IMs) are identified for three masonry façades of churches in free and restrained conditions. A reliability analysis is carried out by considering over 70 earth- quakes, of which 50 recorded during the recent 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake. Four limit states are taken into account: rocking initiation, limited rocking, moderate rocking and near-collapse condition. The yielding limit state is considered for the analysis with anti-seismic devices. Univariate and bivariate fragility curves (FCs) are compared in free and restrained configurations, to discuss the reduction of probability of exceedance de- pending on 15 intensity measures. The results show that the best IMs are velocity-based parameters, in particular the Fajfar Index and Peak Ground Velocity, together with Peak Ground Acceleration. In one-sided motion without restraints, the higher the compression stiffness of the sidewalls, the more unstable the wall is in probabilistic terms. Practical curves show, for each IM, the reduction of probability of exceedance obtained thanks to assumed horizontal restraints. These help to understand, in a stochastic perspective, to what extent the anti-seismic device can be beneficial or detrimental (in case of amplifications of motion) for given earthquake intensities. The comparison of univariate and bivariate FCs confirms the superiority of bivariate FCs. Indeed, often the univariate curves sensitively underestimate the probability of exceedance, especially for low-medium intensity earthquakes, and are not able to offer any information regarding the influence of other IMs.
2018
Rocking; One-sided motion; Fragility curves; Horizontal restraints; Masonry façades; Intensity measures
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Fragility curves for free and restrained rocking masonry façades in one-sided motion / Giresini, L.; Casapulla, C.; Denysiuk, R.; Matos, J.; Sassu, M.. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 1873-7323. - 164:(2018), pp. 195-213. [10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.003]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Giresini_Fragility_Preprint_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.31 MB Adobe PDF
Giresini_Fragility_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.63 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1635937
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact