Objectives: To investigate diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of high-pitch CT coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) with tin filtration (Sn100kVp) versus standard 120kVp high-pitch acquisition. Methods: 78 patients (58% male, 61.5±9.1 years) were prospectively enrolled. Subjects underwent clinical 120kVp high-pitch CACS using third-generation dual-source CT followed by additional high-pitch Sn100kVp acquisition. Agatston scores, calcium volume scores, Agatston score categories, percentile-based risk categorization and radiation metrics were compared. Results: 61/78 patients showed coronary calcifications. Median Agatston scores were 34.9 [0.7–197.1] and 41.7 [0.7–207.2] and calcium volume scores were 34.1 [0.7–218.0] for Sn100kVp and 35.7 [1.1–221.0] for 120kVp acquisitions, respectively (both p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed underestimated Agatston scores and calcium volume scores with Sn100kVp versus 120kVp acquisitions (mean difference: 16.4 and 11.5). However, Agatston score categories and percentile-based risk categories showed excellent agreement (ĸ=0.98 and ĸ=0.99). Image noise was 25.8±4.4HU and 16.6±2.9HU in Sn100kVp and 120kVp scans, respectively (p<0.0001). Dose-length-product was 9.9±4.8mGy*cm and 40.9±14.4mGy*cm with Sn100kVp and 120kVp scans, respectively (p<0.0001). This resulted in significant effective radiation dose reduction (0.13±0.07mSv vs. 0.57±0.2mSv, p<0.0001) for Sn100kVp acquisitions. Conclusion: CACS using high-pitch low-voltage tin-filtered acquisitions demonstrates excellent agreement in Agatston score and percentile-based cardiac risk categorization with standard 120kVp high-pitch acquisitions. Furthermore, radiation dose was significantly reduced by 78% while maintaining accurate risk prediction. Key points: • Coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration reduces radiation dose by 78%. • There is excellent correlation between high-pitch Sn100kVp and standard 120kVp acquisitions. • Excellent agreement regarding Agatston score categories and percentile-based risk categorization was achieved. • No cardiac risk reclassifications were observed using Sn100kVp coronary artery calcium scoring.

High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction / Apfaltrer, G.; Albrecht, M. H.; Schoepf, U. J.; Duguay, T. M.; De Cecco, C. N.; Nance, J. W.; De Santis, D.; Apfaltrer, P.; Eid, M. H.; Eason, C. D.; Thompson, Z. M.; Bauer, M. J.; Varga-Szemes, A.; Jacobs, B. E.; Sorantin, E.; Tesche, C.. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 28:7(2018), pp. 3097-3104. [10.1007/s00330-017-5249-2]

High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction

De Cecco C. N.;De Santis D.;
2018

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of high-pitch CT coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) with tin filtration (Sn100kVp) versus standard 120kVp high-pitch acquisition. Methods: 78 patients (58% male, 61.5±9.1 years) were prospectively enrolled. Subjects underwent clinical 120kVp high-pitch CACS using third-generation dual-source CT followed by additional high-pitch Sn100kVp acquisition. Agatston scores, calcium volume scores, Agatston score categories, percentile-based risk categorization and radiation metrics were compared. Results: 61/78 patients showed coronary calcifications. Median Agatston scores were 34.9 [0.7–197.1] and 41.7 [0.7–207.2] and calcium volume scores were 34.1 [0.7–218.0] for Sn100kVp and 35.7 [1.1–221.0] for 120kVp acquisitions, respectively (both p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed underestimated Agatston scores and calcium volume scores with Sn100kVp versus 120kVp acquisitions (mean difference: 16.4 and 11.5). However, Agatston score categories and percentile-based risk categories showed excellent agreement (ĸ=0.98 and ĸ=0.99). Image noise was 25.8±4.4HU and 16.6±2.9HU in Sn100kVp and 120kVp scans, respectively (p<0.0001). Dose-length-product was 9.9±4.8mGy*cm and 40.9±14.4mGy*cm with Sn100kVp and 120kVp scans, respectively (p<0.0001). This resulted in significant effective radiation dose reduction (0.13±0.07mSv vs. 0.57±0.2mSv, p<0.0001) for Sn100kVp acquisitions. Conclusion: CACS using high-pitch low-voltage tin-filtered acquisitions demonstrates excellent agreement in Agatston score and percentile-based cardiac risk categorization with standard 120kVp high-pitch acquisitions. Furthermore, radiation dose was significantly reduced by 78% while maintaining accurate risk prediction. Key points: • Coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration reduces radiation dose by 78%. • There is excellent correlation between high-pitch Sn100kVp and standard 120kVp acquisitions. • Excellent agreement regarding Agatston score categories and percentile-based risk categorization was achieved. • No cardiac risk reclassifications were observed using Sn100kVp coronary artery calcium scoring.
2018
computed tomography; coronary artery calcium; high-pitch; radiation dose; tin filtration
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction / Apfaltrer, G.; Albrecht, M. H.; Schoepf, U. J.; Duguay, T. M.; De Cecco, C. N.; Nance, J. W.; De Santis, D.; Apfaltrer, P.; Eid, M. H.; Eason, C. D.; Thompson, Z. M.; Bauer, M. J.; Varga-Szemes, A.; Jacobs, B. E.; Sorantin, E.; Tesche, C.. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 28:7(2018), pp. 3097-3104. [10.1007/s00330-017-5249-2]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Apfaltrer_High-pitch_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.19 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1634211
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact