Background: Thyroid nodules are frequent in adult population and thyroid cancer incidence has increased dramatically over the past three decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the US-Elastosonography (USE) diagnostic performance in assessing the thyroid nodules malignancy risk. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched from January 2011 to July 2021. We extracted data from selected studies and calculated the overall diagnostic accuracy of qualitative USE, semi-quantitative USE and quantitative USE. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was elaborated to show the results. All statistical tests were performed using Metadisc and Medcal software package. Results: Finally 72 studies with 13,505 patients and 14,015 thyroid nodules (33% malignant) undergoing elastography were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 84%, 81%, and 0.89 respectively for qualitative USE; 83%, 80%, and 0.93 for semi-quantitative USE and 78%, 81% and 0.87, for quantitative USE. The qualitative and semiquantitative USE present very similar diagnostic accuracy values and both better than the quantitative USE. Conclusions: USE is a useful imaging tool for thyroid nodule characterization. In accordance with recent guidelines and meta-analyses, the USE could be used daily in thyroid nodule malignancy risk stratification. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021279257.
US-elastography with different techniques for thyroid nodule characterization: systematic review and meta-analysis / Cantisani, V., De Silvestri, A., Scotti, V., Fresilli, D., Tarsitano, M.G., Polti, G., Guiban, O., Polito, E., Pacini, P., Durante, C., Grani, G., Isidori, A.M., Giannetta, E., Sorrenti, S., Trimboli, P., Catalano, C., Cirocchi, R., Lauro, A., D'Andrea, V.. - In: FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2234-943X. - 12:(2022). [10.3389/fonc.2022.845549]
US-elastography with different techniques for thyroid nodule characterization: systematic review and meta-analysis
Cantisani, Vito
Primo
;Fresilli, Daniele
;Tarsitano, Maria Grazia;Polti, Giorgia;Guiban, Olga;Polito, Eleonora;Pacini, Patrizia;Durante, Cosimo;Grani, Giorgio;Isidori, Andrea M;Giannetta, Elisa;Sorrenti, Salvatore;Catalano, Carlo;Lauro, AugustoPenultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;D'Andrea, VitoUltimo
2022
Abstract
Background: Thyroid nodules are frequent in adult population and thyroid cancer incidence has increased dramatically over the past three decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the US-Elastosonography (USE) diagnostic performance in assessing the thyroid nodules malignancy risk. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched from January 2011 to July 2021. We extracted data from selected studies and calculated the overall diagnostic accuracy of qualitative USE, semi-quantitative USE and quantitative USE. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was elaborated to show the results. All statistical tests were performed using Metadisc and Medcal software package. Results: Finally 72 studies with 13,505 patients and 14,015 thyroid nodules (33% malignant) undergoing elastography were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 84%, 81%, and 0.89 respectively for qualitative USE; 83%, 80%, and 0.93 for semi-quantitative USE and 78%, 81% and 0.87, for quantitative USE. The qualitative and semiquantitative USE present very similar diagnostic accuracy values and both better than the quantitative USE. Conclusions: USE is a useful imaging tool for thyroid nodule characterization. In accordance with recent guidelines and meta-analyses, the USE could be used daily in thyroid nodule malignancy risk stratification. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021279257.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cantisani_US-Elastography_2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.845549/full
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.37 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


