The severe impact of global crises, such as COVID-19 and climate change, is plausibly reshaping the way in which people perceive risks. In this paper, we examine and compare how global crises and local disasters influence public perceptions of multiple hazards in Italy and Sweden. To this end, we integrate information about the occurrence of hazardous events with the results of two nationwide surveys. These included more than 4000 participants and were conducted in two different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic corresponding to low (August 2020) and high (November 2020) levels of infection rates. We found that, in both countries, people are more worried about risks related to experienced events. This is in line with the cognitive process known as the availability heuristic: individuals assess the risk associated with a given hazard based on how easily it comes to their mind. Epidemics, for example, are perceived as less likely and more impactful in Italy compared to Sweden. This outcome can be explained by cross-country differences in the impact of, as well as governmental responses to, COVID-19. Notwithstanding the ongoing pandemic, people in both Italy and Sweden are highly concerned about climate change, and they rank it as the most likely threat.

Multiple hazards and risk perceptions over time. The availability heuristic in Italy and Sweden under COVID-19 / Di Baldassarre, G.; Mondino, E.; Rusca, M.; Del Giudice, E.; Mard, J.; Ridolfi, E.; Scolobig, A.; Raffetti, E.. - In: NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES. - ISSN 1561-8633. - 21:11(2021), pp. 3439-3447. [10.5194/nhess-21-3439-2021]

Multiple hazards and risk perceptions over time. The availability heuristic in Italy and Sweden under COVID-19

Ridolfi E.;
2021

Abstract

The severe impact of global crises, such as COVID-19 and climate change, is plausibly reshaping the way in which people perceive risks. In this paper, we examine and compare how global crises and local disasters influence public perceptions of multiple hazards in Italy and Sweden. To this end, we integrate information about the occurrence of hazardous events with the results of two nationwide surveys. These included more than 4000 participants and were conducted in two different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic corresponding to low (August 2020) and high (November 2020) levels of infection rates. We found that, in both countries, people are more worried about risks related to experienced events. This is in line with the cognitive process known as the availability heuristic: individuals assess the risk associated with a given hazard based on how easily it comes to their mind. Epidemics, for example, are perceived as less likely and more impactful in Italy compared to Sweden. This outcome can be explained by cross-country differences in the impact of, as well as governmental responses to, COVID-19. Notwithstanding the ongoing pandemic, people in both Italy and Sweden are highly concerned about climate change, and they rank it as the most likely threat.
2021
multiple hazards; risk perceptions; availability heuristic; covid-19
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Multiple hazards and risk perceptions over time. The availability heuristic in Italy and Sweden under COVID-19 / Di Baldassarre, G.; Mondino, E.; Rusca, M.; Del Giudice, E.; Mard, J.; Ridolfi, E.; Scolobig, A.; Raffetti, E.. - In: NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES. - ISSN 1561-8633. - 21:11(2021), pp. 3439-3447. [10.5194/nhess-21-3439-2021]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DiBaldassarre_Multiple-hazards-risk -2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 997.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
997.68 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1626558
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact