In its opinion of 15th April 2021 in case C-561/19, Consorzio Italian Management and Catania Multiservizi (ECLI:EU:C:2021:291) AG Bobek proposed to revise the CILFIT criteria which famously concern the duty of the National courts of last instance to request a preliminary ruling. After a brief analysis on the controversial relationship between discretion and duty to request a preliminary ruling, this Insight focuses critically on the three cumulative conditions under which, according to AG Bobek, national judges of last instance have a duty to refer and, in particular, on the condition concerning the existence of a general issue of interpretation of EU law. In the last section, the Insight argues that this condition would downgrade the binding effect of a preliminary ruling and would make it similar to the advisory opinions envisaged by Protocol n. 16 to the European Convention of Human Rights.
Sulla riformulazione dei criteri CILFIT. le Conclusioni dell’A.G. Bobek nel caso Consorzio Italian Management e Catania Multiservizi / Liguori, Francesco. - In: EUROPEAN PAPERS. - ISSN 2499-8249. - 6:2(2021), pp. 955-965. [10.15166/2499-8249/508]
Sulla riformulazione dei criteri CILFIT. le Conclusioni dell’A.G. Bobek nel caso Consorzio Italian Management e Catania Multiservizi
Francesco Liguori
2021
Abstract
In its opinion of 15th April 2021 in case C-561/19, Consorzio Italian Management and Catania Multiservizi (ECLI:EU:C:2021:291) AG Bobek proposed to revise the CILFIT criteria which famously concern the duty of the National courts of last instance to request a preliminary ruling. After a brief analysis on the controversial relationship between discretion and duty to request a preliminary ruling, this Insight focuses critically on the three cumulative conditions under which, according to AG Bobek, national judges of last instance have a duty to refer and, in particular, on the condition concerning the existence of a general issue of interpretation of EU law. In the last section, the Insight argues that this condition would downgrade the binding effect of a preliminary ruling and would make it similar to the advisory opinions envisaged by Protocol n. 16 to the European Convention of Human Rights.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Liguori_Sulla_riformulazione_dei_2021.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/criteri-cilfit-nelle-conclusioni-dell-ag-bobek-nel-caso-consorzio-italian-management
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
226.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
226.84 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.