Background: According to 2008/2016 classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), a platelet (PLT) count ≥ 450 × 109/L, reduced from the previously published WHO 2001 indicated level ≥ 600 × 109/L, was considered the new PLT threshold for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients and Methods: To validate this important diagnostic change in a setting of current clinical practice, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and hematologic features at diagnosis and during follow-up of 162 patients with ET, diagnosed in our center from January 2008 to December 2017. We subdivided patients according to PLT value at baseline into Group A (PLT ≥ 600 × 109/L) (124 patients; 76.5%) and Group B (PLT ≥ 450 × 109/L < 600 × 109/L) (38 patients; 23.5%). Results: Among clinical features, only the median value of leukocytes (P < .001) was significantly higher in Group A. Cytostatic treatment was administered in 103 patients, with a significantly higher rate in patients of group A (P < .001). After a median follow-up of 42.4 months (interquartile range, 22.1-70.6 months), 8 thrombotic events were recorded in the entire cohort, without differences between the 2 groups (P = .336). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 96.9% (95% confidence interval, 92.6%-100%), without differences between the 2 groups (P = .255). Conclusions: Our data indicate a substantial homogeneity among patients with ET regardless of the PLT count at diagnosis, thus confirming the usefulness of the 2008/2016 WHO diagnostic criteria.

Clinical and Prognostic Features of Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparison of 2001 WHO Versus 2008/2016 WHO Criteria in a Large Single-center Cohort / Chiatamone Ranieri, S., Arleo, M.A., Trasarti, S., Bizzoni, L., Carmosino, I., De Luca, M.L., Mohamed, S., Mariggio, E., Scalzulli, E., Rosati, S., De Benedittis, D., Colafigli, G., Pepe, S., Molica, M., Scamuffa, M.C., Di Prima, A., Ferretti, A., Baldacci, E., Mancini, M., Santoro, C., et al.. - In: CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA. - ISSN 2152-2650. - 21:4(2021), pp. e328-e333. [10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.003]

Clinical and Prognostic Features of Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparison of 2001 WHO Versus 2008/2016 WHO Criteria in a Large Single-center Cohort

Chiatamone Ranieri S.;Bizzoni L.;Carmosino I.;Mohamed S.;Scalzulli E.;Colafigli G.;Pepe S.;Molica M.;Scamuffa M. C.;Ferretti A.;Baldacci E.;Santoro C.;Vignetti M.;
2021

Abstract

Background: According to 2008/2016 classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), a platelet (PLT) count ≥ 450 × 109/L, reduced from the previously published WHO 2001 indicated level ≥ 600 × 109/L, was considered the new PLT threshold for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients and Methods: To validate this important diagnostic change in a setting of current clinical practice, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and hematologic features at diagnosis and during follow-up of 162 patients with ET, diagnosed in our center from January 2008 to December 2017. We subdivided patients according to PLT value at baseline into Group A (PLT ≥ 600 × 109/L) (124 patients; 76.5%) and Group B (PLT ≥ 450 × 109/L < 600 × 109/L) (38 patients; 23.5%). Results: Among clinical features, only the median value of leukocytes (P < .001) was significantly higher in Group A. Cytostatic treatment was administered in 103 patients, with a significantly higher rate in patients of group A (P < .001). After a median follow-up of 42.4 months (interquartile range, 22.1-70.6 months), 8 thrombotic events were recorded in the entire cohort, without differences between the 2 groups (P = .336). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 96.9% (95% confidence interval, 92.6%-100%), without differences between the 2 groups (P = .255). Conclusions: Our data indicate a substantial homogeneity among patients with ET regardless of the PLT count at diagnosis, thus confirming the usefulness of the 2008/2016 WHO diagnostic criteria.
2021
Diagnostic threshold; Platelets; Real-life assessment; Thrombosis; WHO classification; Aged; Cytostatic Agents; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Count; Prognosis; Reference Values; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis; World Health Organization
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Clinical and Prognostic Features of Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparison of 2001 WHO Versus 2008/2016 WHO Criteria in a Large Single-center Cohort / Chiatamone Ranieri, S., Arleo, M.A., Trasarti, S., Bizzoni, L., Carmosino, I., De Luca, M.L., Mohamed, S., Mariggio, E., Scalzulli, E., Rosati, S., De Benedittis, D., Colafigli, G., Pepe, S., Molica, M., Scamuffa, M.C., Di Prima, A., Ferretti, A., Baldacci, E., Mancini, M., Santoro, C., et al.. - In: CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA. - ISSN 2152-2650. - 21:4(2021), pp. e328-e333. [10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.003]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1617966
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact