Literature shows that biomechanical risk in kerbside waste collection is high and widespread. The different work environments and working conditions make hard to use standardized protocols. Moreover, the lifting index limitations and restrictions (handling overhead, temperature and humidity) do not allow the use of the NIOSH protocol in this kind of activity. Manual handling of bins was investigated in four different operating modes: through 1) a lorry side window; 2) at the back of the lorry; 3) in a certified container; 4) in a non-certified container. Dynamic REBA was applied for risk assessment. The most dangerous one is mode 2 where the mean REBA scores were 9.8 for the right upper limb and 8.5 for the left upper limb. The posture above shoulder height adopted by the upper limbs contributed to reach these values. The emptying technique that presented the lowest risk level was mode 3. With this technique, the mean REBA scores were 8.8 for the right upper limb and 6.7 for the left upper limb. However, the reduced capacity of the certified container resulted in a significant time increase in the collection round. It would be useful to design larger containers to be mechanically poured so optimizing collection times and reduce biomechanical risk. Synergic effects with other risk factors (vibrations, weather conditions, etc.) are not assessed in this paper.

Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Kerbside Waste Collection Through Dynamic REBA Protocol / Silvetti, A.; Fiori, L.; Tatarelli, A.; Ranavolo, A.; Spagnoli, E.; Draicchio, F.. - 222:(2021), pp. 837-844. (Intervento presentato al convegno 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2021 tenutosi a Online) [10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_114].

Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Kerbside Waste Collection Through Dynamic REBA Protocol

Fiori L.;Tatarelli A.;Ranavolo A.;Draicchio F.
2021

Abstract

Literature shows that biomechanical risk in kerbside waste collection is high and widespread. The different work environments and working conditions make hard to use standardized protocols. Moreover, the lifting index limitations and restrictions (handling overhead, temperature and humidity) do not allow the use of the NIOSH protocol in this kind of activity. Manual handling of bins was investigated in four different operating modes: through 1) a lorry side window; 2) at the back of the lorry; 3) in a certified container; 4) in a non-certified container. Dynamic REBA was applied for risk assessment. The most dangerous one is mode 2 where the mean REBA scores were 9.8 for the right upper limb and 8.5 for the left upper limb. The posture above shoulder height adopted by the upper limbs contributed to reach these values. The emptying technique that presented the lowest risk level was mode 3. With this technique, the mean REBA scores were 8.8 for the right upper limb and 6.7 for the left upper limb. However, the reduced capacity of the certified container resulted in a significant time increase in the collection round. It would be useful to design larger containers to be mechanically poured so optimizing collection times and reduce biomechanical risk. Synergic effects with other risk factors (vibrations, weather conditions, etc.) are not assessed in this paper.
2021
21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2021
Biomechanical load; Ergonomic; MSDs; Muscle fatigue
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Kerbside Waste Collection Through Dynamic REBA Protocol / Silvetti, A.; Fiori, L.; Tatarelli, A.; Ranavolo, A.; Spagnoli, E.; Draicchio, F.. - 222:(2021), pp. 837-844. (Intervento presentato al convegno 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2021 tenutosi a Online) [10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_114].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1617010
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact