Estrogenic compounds are widely released to surface waters and may cause adverse effects to sensitive aquatic species. Three hormones, estrone, 1711-estradiol and 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol, are of particular concern as they are bioactive at very low concentrations. Current analytical methods are not all sensitive enough for monitoring these substances in water and do not cover mixture effects. Bioassays could complement chemical analysis since they detect the overall effect of complex mixtures. Here, four chemical mixtures and two hormone mixtures were prepared and tested as reference materials together with two environmental water samples by eight laboratories employing nine in vitro and in vivo bioassays covering different steps involved in the estrogenic response. The reference materials included priority substances under the European Water Framework Directive, hormones and other emerging pollutants. Each substance in the mixture was present at its proposed safety limit concentration (EQS) in the European legislation.The in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effect of chemical mixtures even when 1711-estradiol was not present but differences in responsiveness were observed. LiBERA was the most responsive, followed by LYES. The additive effect of the hormones was captured by ER alpha-CALUX, MELN, LYES and LiBERA. Particularly, all in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effects in environmental water samples (EEQ values in the range of 0.75-304 & times; EQS), although the concentrations of hormones were below the limit of quantification in analytical measurements. The present study confirms the applicability of reference materials for estrogenic effects' detection through bioassays and indicates possible methodological drawbacks of some of them that may lead to false negative/positive outcomes. The observed difference in responsiveness among bioassays-based on mixture composition -is probably due to biological differences between them, suggesting that panels of bioassays with different characteristics should be applied according to specific environmental pollution conditions.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Estrogenicity of chemical mixtures revealed by a panel of bioassays / Gómez, Livia; Niegowska, Magdalena; Navarro, Anna; Amendola, Luca; Arukwe, Augustine; Ait-Aissa, Selim; Balzamo, Stefania; Barreca, Salvatore; Belkin, Shimshon; Bittner, Michal; Blaha, Ludek; Buchinger, Sebastian; Busetto, Maddalena; Carere, Mario; Colzani, Luisa; Dellavedova, Pierluisa; Denslow, Nancy; Escher, Beate I; Hogstrand, Christer; Khan, Essa Ahsan; König, Maria; Kroll, Kevin J; Lacchetti, Ines; Maillot-Marechal, Emmanuelle; Moscovici, Liat; Potalivo, Monica; Sanseverino, Isabella; Santos, Ricardo; Schifferli, Andrea; Schlichting, Rita; Sforzini, Susanna; Simon, Eszter; Shpigel, Etai; Sturzenbaum, Stephen; Vermeirssen, Etienne; Viarengo, Aldo; Werner, Inge; Lettieri, Teresa. - In: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 0048-9697. - 785:(2021), p. 147284. [10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147284]

Estrogenicity of chemical mixtures revealed by a panel of bioassays

Carere, Mario;Lacchetti, Ines;Potalivo, Monica;Sanseverino, Isabella;
2021

Abstract

Estrogenic compounds are widely released to surface waters and may cause adverse effects to sensitive aquatic species. Three hormones, estrone, 1711-estradiol and 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol, are of particular concern as they are bioactive at very low concentrations. Current analytical methods are not all sensitive enough for monitoring these substances in water and do not cover mixture effects. Bioassays could complement chemical analysis since they detect the overall effect of complex mixtures. Here, four chemical mixtures and two hormone mixtures were prepared and tested as reference materials together with two environmental water samples by eight laboratories employing nine in vitro and in vivo bioassays covering different steps involved in the estrogenic response. The reference materials included priority substances under the European Water Framework Directive, hormones and other emerging pollutants. Each substance in the mixture was present at its proposed safety limit concentration (EQS) in the European legislation.The in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effect of chemical mixtures even when 1711-estradiol was not present but differences in responsiveness were observed. LiBERA was the most responsive, followed by LYES. The additive effect of the hormones was captured by ER alpha-CALUX, MELN, LYES and LiBERA. Particularly, all in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effects in environmental water samples (EEQ values in the range of 0.75-304 & times; EQS), although the concentrations of hormones were below the limit of quantification in analytical measurements. The present study confirms the applicability of reference materials for estrogenic effects' detection through bioassays and indicates possible methodological drawbacks of some of them that may lead to false negative/positive outcomes. The observed difference in responsiveness among bioassays-based on mixture composition -is probably due to biological differences between them, suggesting that panels of bioassays with different characteristics should be applied according to specific environmental pollution conditions.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
2021
Bioassay; Chemical mixture; Endocrine disrupting compound (EDC); Environmental quality standard (EQS); Estrogenicity; Hormone mixture; Biological Assay; Environmental Monitoring; Estrogens; Estrone; Endocrine Disruptors; Water Pollutants, Chemical
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Estrogenicity of chemical mixtures revealed by a panel of bioassays / Gómez, Livia; Niegowska, Magdalena; Navarro, Anna; Amendola, Luca; Arukwe, Augustine; Ait-Aissa, Selim; Balzamo, Stefania; Barreca, Salvatore; Belkin, Shimshon; Bittner, Michal; Blaha, Ludek; Buchinger, Sebastian; Busetto, Maddalena; Carere, Mario; Colzani, Luisa; Dellavedova, Pierluisa; Denslow, Nancy; Escher, Beate I; Hogstrand, Christer; Khan, Essa Ahsan; König, Maria; Kroll, Kevin J; Lacchetti, Ines; Maillot-Marechal, Emmanuelle; Moscovici, Liat; Potalivo, Monica; Sanseverino, Isabella; Santos, Ricardo; Schifferli, Andrea; Schlichting, Rita; Sforzini, Susanna; Simon, Eszter; Shpigel, Etai; Sturzenbaum, Stephen; Vermeirssen, Etienne; Viarengo, Aldo; Werner, Inge; Lettieri, Teresa. - In: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 0048-9697. - 785:(2021), p. 147284. [10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147284]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1616994
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact