The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is central in biodiversity conservation, but insufficient resources hamper its long-term growth, updating, and consistency. Models or automated calculations can alleviate those challenges by providing standardised estimates required for assessments, or prioritising species for (re-)assessments. However, while numerous scientific papers have proposed such methods, few have been integrated into assessment practice, highlighting a critical research–implementation gap. We believe this gap can be bridged by fostering communication and collaboration between academic researchers and Red List practitioners, and by developing and maintaining user-friendly platforms to automate application of the methods. We propose that developing methods better encompassing Red List criteria, systems, and drivers is the next priority to support the Red List.
Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments / Cazalis, V.; Di Marco, M.; Butchart, S. H. M.; Akcakaya, H. R.; Gonzalez-Suarez, M.; Meyer, C.; Clausnitzer, V.; Bohm, M.; Zizka, A.; Cardoso, P.; Schipper, A. M.; Bachman, S. P.; Young, B. E.; Hoffmann, M.; Benitez-Lopez, A.; Lucas, P. M.; Pettorelli, N.; Patoine, G.; Pacifici, M.; Jorger-Hickfang, T.; Brooks, T. M.; Rondinini, C.; Hill, S. L. L.; Visconti, P.; Santini, L.. - In: TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION. - ISSN 0169-5347. - 37:4(2022), pp. 359-370. [10.1016/j.tree.2021.12.002]
Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments
Di Marco M.;Lucas P. M.;Pacifici M.;Rondinini C.;Santini L.Ultimo
Conceptualization
2022
Abstract
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is central in biodiversity conservation, but insufficient resources hamper its long-term growth, updating, and consistency. Models or automated calculations can alleviate those challenges by providing standardised estimates required for assessments, or prioritising species for (re-)assessments. However, while numerous scientific papers have proposed such methods, few have been integrated into assessment practice, highlighting a critical research–implementation gap. We believe this gap can be bridged by fostering communication and collaboration between academic researchers and Red List practitioners, and by developing and maintaining user-friendly platforms to automate application of the methods. We propose that developing methods better encompassing Red List criteria, systems, and drivers is the next priority to support the Red List.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cazalis_Bridging_2022.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
2.13 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.13 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.