The aim of this paper is to review the theory of equivalence as interpreted by some of the most innovative theorists in this field— Vinay and Darbelnet, Jakobson, Nida and Taber, Catford, House, and finally Baker. These theorists have studied equivalence in relation to the translation process, using different approaches, and have provided fruitful ideas for further study on this topic. Their theories will be analyzed in chronological order so that it will be easier to follow the evolution of this concept.
Equivalence in Translation: Between Myth and Reality / Leonardi, V.. - In: TRANSLATION JOURNAL. - ISSN 1536-7207. - 4:4(2000), pp. 3-10.
Equivalence in Translation: Between Myth and Reality
V. Leonardi
2000
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to review the theory of equivalence as interpreted by some of the most innovative theorists in this field— Vinay and Darbelnet, Jakobson, Nida and Taber, Catford, House, and finally Baker. These theorists have studied equivalence in relation to the translation process, using different approaches, and have provided fruitful ideas for further study on this topic. Their theories will be analyzed in chronological order so that it will be easier to follow the evolution of this concept.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Leonardi_Equivalence_2000-pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
418.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
418.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
