The present study focuses on the selection process of the inkblots for a new brief version of the Holtzman Inkblot Technique capable to overcome two criticisms that were addressed to the test: the excessive time of the administration (and scoring) and the limitation of one response to each inkblot. The selection of the blots from Form A was based on empirical data and the literature from both HIT and Rorschach. The work focused on the distal features of the blots and their contribution to diagnosis. Four criteria were selected for the evaluation of each inkblot: their symmetry/asymmetry quality, their frequency of Popular (P) responses, their structural ambiguity, and their ability to discriminate normals from clinical patients. A total of 13 inkblots were selected to which future psychologists/researchers can ask for two responses each. The implication of this new brief version of the test for both clinicians and researchers and suggestions for futures research are discussed.

The Holtzman Inkblot Technique: proposal for a new brief version / Dawe, James; Hawkins II, Raymond C.; Pezzuti, Lina. - In: PSYCHOLOGY HUB. - ISSN 2723-973X. - 3:(2022), pp. 61-70. [10.13133/2724-2943/17502]

The Holtzman Inkblot Technique: proposal for a new brief version

James Dawe
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Lina Pezzuti
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2022

Abstract

The present study focuses on the selection process of the inkblots for a new brief version of the Holtzman Inkblot Technique capable to overcome two criticisms that were addressed to the test: the excessive time of the administration (and scoring) and the limitation of one response to each inkblot. The selection of the blots from Form A was based on empirical data and the literature from both HIT and Rorschach. The work focused on the distal features of the blots and their contribution to diagnosis. Four criteria were selected for the evaluation of each inkblot: their symmetry/asymmetry quality, their frequency of Popular (P) responses, their structural ambiguity, and their ability to discriminate normals from clinical patients. A total of 13 inkblots were selected to which future psychologists/researchers can ask for two responses each. The implication of this new brief version of the test for both clinicians and researchers and suggestions for futures research are discussed.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1610514
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact