Record-making and record-keeping were amongst the most basic aspects of warfare, which implied an amassing of public records related to the recruitment, provisioning and management of soldiers. In Renaissance Florence, the militia force created after Niccolò Machiavelli’s project in 1506, then re-established during the last popular government of 1527-1530, involved the production of two types of administrative records: the low-level ‘practical’ records which documented the daily running of an army in the field, such as muster rolls, annotations and detailed lists of militiamen; and the upper-level administrative records, such as the official correspondence between the central governing bodies and the military officers in the territories, orders and instructions. As Secretary of the Nove di Ordinanza e Milizia, the new magistracy in charge of the administration of the militia, Machiavelli himself engaged in both documentary activities. An analysis of published and unpublished documentation provides evidence of the importance of such documentary practices, and especially improves our knowledge of problems relating to the loss and preservation of low-level military records relating to Renaissance Florentine ordinances and militia. Unknown documentation provides further details on Machiavelli’s involvement in the preparation of the Provisione della ordinanza of 1506.

‘Per peli e per segni’. Muster rolls, lists and notes: practical military records relating to the last Florentine Ordinanze and militia, from Machiavelli to the fall of the Republic (1506–30) / Guidi, A. - In: HISTORICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0950-3471. - 89:246(2016). [10.1111/1468-2281.12156]

‘Per peli e per segni’. Muster rolls, lists and notes: practical military records relating to the last Florentine Ordinanze and militia, from Machiavelli to the fall of the Republic (1506–30)

Guidi A
2016

Abstract

Record-making and record-keeping were amongst the most basic aspects of warfare, which implied an amassing of public records related to the recruitment, provisioning and management of soldiers. In Renaissance Florence, the militia force created after Niccolò Machiavelli’s project in 1506, then re-established during the last popular government of 1527-1530, involved the production of two types of administrative records: the low-level ‘practical’ records which documented the daily running of an army in the field, such as muster rolls, annotations and detailed lists of militiamen; and the upper-level administrative records, such as the official correspondence between the central governing bodies and the military officers in the territories, orders and instructions. As Secretary of the Nove di Ordinanza e Milizia, the new magistracy in charge of the administration of the militia, Machiavelli himself engaged in both documentary activities. An analysis of published and unpublished documentation provides evidence of the importance of such documentary practices, and especially improves our knowledge of problems relating to the loss and preservation of low-level military records relating to Renaissance Florentine ordinances and militia. Unknown documentation provides further details on Machiavelli’s involvement in the preparation of the Provisione della ordinanza of 1506.
2016
Written records; Machiavelli; Florentine republic; Florence; Archives
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
‘Per peli e per segni’. Muster rolls, lists and notes: practical military records relating to the last Florentine Ordinanze and militia, from Machiavelli to the fall of the Republic (1506–30) / Guidi, A. - In: HISTORICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0950-3471. - 89:246(2016). [10.1111/1468-2281.12156]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Guidi_Per-peli-e-per-segni_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 195.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
195.67 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1604431
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact