At the beginning of the "De dialectica" chapter of his "Institutiones saeculares", Cassiodorus places a diagram illustrating the traditional Aristotelian division of Philosophy into "inspectiua" and "actualis", probably following a Greek source from the Alexandrian School. The same scheme is adopted by Isidore in his "Etymologiae"; Isidore, however, also combines it with the ‘Platonic’ divisio of the same discipline into "physica", "ethica" and "logica". It is, therefore, primarily from Cassiodorus and Isidore that the Carolingian Renaissance received the opposition between these ‘Platonic’ and ‘Aristotelian’ schemes, which became so relevant in subsequent centuries for the classification of the Liberal Arts. This article discusses the additions to Cassiodorus’ "divisio philosophiae" in the second interpolated recension of the "Institutiones" (Δ), that is, the textual form in which this work enjoyed its greatest popularity between the ninth and the eleventh centuries. Interpolations in Δ manuscripts are affected by textual mistakes and at times obscure, as a result of the attempt to balance the various branches of ‘Platonic’ and ‘Aristotelian’ schemes, but they also show traces of possibly ancient Greek material. A careful analysis of this material will therefore allow us to consider copyists’ and readers’ competences on the classification of knowledge during the Early Middle Ages.

The Division of Knowledge between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Diagrams on the "divisio philosophiae" in Cassiodorus’ "Institutiones saeculares" / Morresi, Ilaria. - 27:(2021), pp. 53-67. (Intervento presentato al convegno Eighteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies tenutosi a Oxford).

The Division of Knowledge between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Diagrams on the "divisio philosophiae" in Cassiodorus’ "Institutiones saeculares"

Ilaria Morresi
2021

Abstract

At the beginning of the "De dialectica" chapter of his "Institutiones saeculares", Cassiodorus places a diagram illustrating the traditional Aristotelian division of Philosophy into "inspectiua" and "actualis", probably following a Greek source from the Alexandrian School. The same scheme is adopted by Isidore in his "Etymologiae"; Isidore, however, also combines it with the ‘Platonic’ divisio of the same discipline into "physica", "ethica" and "logica". It is, therefore, primarily from Cassiodorus and Isidore that the Carolingian Renaissance received the opposition between these ‘Platonic’ and ‘Aristotelian’ schemes, which became so relevant in subsequent centuries for the classification of the Liberal Arts. This article discusses the additions to Cassiodorus’ "divisio philosophiae" in the second interpolated recension of the "Institutiones" (Δ), that is, the textual form in which this work enjoyed its greatest popularity between the ninth and the eleventh centuries. Interpolations in Δ manuscripts are affected by textual mistakes and at times obscure, as a result of the attempt to balance the various branches of ‘Platonic’ and ‘Aristotelian’ schemes, but they also show traces of possibly ancient Greek material. A careful analysis of this material will therefore allow us to consider copyists’ and readers’ competences on the classification of knowledge during the Early Middle Ages.
2021
Eighteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies
Cassiodoro, divisione della filosofia, scuola alessandrina
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
The Division of Knowledge between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Diagrams on the "divisio philosophiae" in Cassiodorus’ "Institutiones saeculares" / Morresi, Ilaria. - 27:(2021), pp. 53-67. (Intervento presentato al convegno Eighteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies tenutosi a Oxford).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1604346
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact