Objective: This study was performed to examine the suitability of transplantation in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a high body mass index (BMI). Methods: In total, 370 consecutive KTRs stratified according to the World Health Organization BMI categories were retrospectively analysed. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was used to assess allograft function. Results: The mean BMI was 26.2 kg/m2. Among all patients, 148 (40.0%) were pre-obese, 47 (12.7%) were class I obese, 11 (3.0%) were class II obese, and 9 (2.4%) were class III obese. A linear trend for male sex and younger age was observed from the normal BMI group through the progressively higher groups. Overweight and obese KTRs had a significantly higher incidence of pre-transplant diabetes, but there was no difference in post-transplant new-onset hyperglycae-mia. Obesity was not a significant risk factor for a lower eGFR at the 1-year follow-up, but it became significant at the 2- and 3-year follow-ups. Graft loss occurred in 28 patients, and 25 patients died during follow-up. No difference in all-cause allograft loss was found among the different BMI groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Obesity affects the eGFR in the long term. Allograft survival was lower, but not significantly.

Obesity affects graft function but not graft loss in kidney transplant recipients / Bellini, MARIA IRENE; Koutroutsos, Kostas; Nananpragasam, Hannah; Deurloo, Emily; Galliford, Jack; Elliot Herbert, Paul. - In: JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0300-0605. - (2020). [10.1177/0300060519895139]

Obesity affects graft function but not graft loss in kidney transplant recipients

Maria Irene Bellini
Primo
;
2020

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to examine the suitability of transplantation in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a high body mass index (BMI). Methods: In total, 370 consecutive KTRs stratified according to the World Health Organization BMI categories were retrospectively analysed. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was used to assess allograft function. Results: The mean BMI was 26.2 kg/m2. Among all patients, 148 (40.0%) were pre-obese, 47 (12.7%) were class I obese, 11 (3.0%) were class II obese, and 9 (2.4%) were class III obese. A linear trend for male sex and younger age was observed from the normal BMI group through the progressively higher groups. Overweight and obese KTRs had a significantly higher incidence of pre-transplant diabetes, but there was no difference in post-transplant new-onset hyperglycae-mia. Obesity was not a significant risk factor for a lower eGFR at the 1-year follow-up, but it became significant at the 2- and 3-year follow-ups. Graft loss occurred in 28 patients, and 25 patients died during follow-up. No difference in all-cause allograft loss was found among the different BMI groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Obesity affects the eGFR in the long term. Allograft survival was lower, but not significantly.
2020
Obesity; kidney transplant; body mass index; kidney function; bariatric surgery; estimated glomerular filtration rate
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Obesity affects graft function but not graft loss in kidney transplant recipients / Bellini, MARIA IRENE; Koutroutsos, Kostas; Nananpragasam, Hannah; Deurloo, Emily; Galliford, Jack; Elliot Herbert, Paul. - In: JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0300-0605. - (2020). [10.1177/0300060519895139]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bellini_Obesity-affects-graft_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 342.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
342.12 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1603437
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact