The article takes as a starting point, the observation of a deep and long-standing gap be­ tween the views of biologists/physicians and that of physicists/data scientists when deal­ ing with life sciences. This gap has been exacerbated by the advent of large-scale -omics technologies that, have produced large amounts of molecular data impossible to handle in the conventional way. Consequently, it prevents the advancement, of interdisciplinary research that, should be able to “make (biological) sense of (biological) data”. Indeed, on the one hand, “life scientists” tend to define their discipline as independent, of any math­ ematical formalization and, on the other hand, “number scientists” are in search of uni­ versal principles based on mathematical laws, Here, we focus on the impact of this gap in the field of precision medicine that, impedes dialogue between omics data analysist.s and precision medicine physicians, because of the profound differences in cultural back­ ground and mindset between the two, To try to overcome (or reduce) this cultural divide, the article suggests a new possibility through network science and the use of a common language. Such common language is a shared vocabulary of words that, have different, meanings in each discipline but refer to the same “thing” (cell behavior, health, disease, etc,), For example, the concept, of “community” on a network is an important topic of research and several algorithms are available for finding such communities (or clusters, modules). By contrast,, from a biological/medical perspective, the same concept, has dif­ ferent. meanings. A community of genes, proteins, or patients is there because they share some common molecular mechanism or purpose (function), This simple example makes it. clear that we can move directly from biological concepts to network patterns and algorithms and backwards, thus generating a true dialogue between “life scientists” and “number scientists”, even though each remains in its own cultural domain. This latter point, is very important, because physicians are often intimidated by mathematics and data scientists are usually interested in the algorithms themselves and not. in their bio­ logical significance. The article presents several simple network concepts and algorithms relevant to precision medicine as a starting point for a true interdisciplinary dialogue.

Network as a language for precision medicine / Farina, Lorenzo. - In: ANNALI DELL'ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ. - ISSN 2384-8553. - 57:4(2021), pp. 331-344. [10.4415/ANN_21_04_08]

Network as a language for precision medicine

Lorenzo Farina
Primo
Conceptualization
2021

Abstract

The article takes as a starting point, the observation of a deep and long-standing gap be­ tween the views of biologists/physicians and that of physicists/data scientists when deal­ ing with life sciences. This gap has been exacerbated by the advent of large-scale -omics technologies that, have produced large amounts of molecular data impossible to handle in the conventional way. Consequently, it prevents the advancement, of interdisciplinary research that, should be able to “make (biological) sense of (biological) data”. Indeed, on the one hand, “life scientists” tend to define their discipline as independent, of any math­ ematical formalization and, on the other hand, “number scientists” are in search of uni­ versal principles based on mathematical laws, Here, we focus on the impact of this gap in the field of precision medicine that, impedes dialogue between omics data analysist.s and precision medicine physicians, because of the profound differences in cultural back­ ground and mindset between the two, To try to overcome (or reduce) this cultural divide, the article suggests a new possibility through network science and the use of a common language. Such common language is a shared vocabulary of words that, have different, meanings in each discipline but refer to the same “thing” (cell behavior, health, disease, etc,), For example, the concept, of “community” on a network is an important topic of research and several algorithms are available for finding such communities (or clusters, modules). By contrast,, from a biological/medical perspective, the same concept, has dif­ ferent. meanings. A community of genes, proteins, or patients is there because they share some common molecular mechanism or purpose (function), This simple example makes it. clear that we can move directly from biological concepts to network patterns and algorithms and backwards, thus generating a true dialogue between “life scientists” and “number scientists”, even though each remains in its own cultural domain. This latter point, is very important, because physicians are often intimidated by mathematics and data scientists are usually interested in the algorithms themselves and not. in their bio­ logical significance. The article presents several simple network concepts and algorithms relevant to precision medicine as a starting point for a true interdisciplinary dialogue.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Farina_Network_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: DOI: 10.4415/ANN_21_04_08
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.57 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1587192
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact