Chen et al. meta-analyzed the studies comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), which is currently held to be the gold standard for the surgical treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) due to unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). They could include only fve small non-randomized retrospective studies, and, moreover, their meta-analysis was afected by several methodological faws and mistakes that, on the whole, question the validity of its results and the strength of its conclusions.
Letter to the editor on “Ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for the treatment of aldosterone‑producing adenoma: a meta-analysis” / Schiavone, D.; Sanga, V.; Iacobone, M.; Rossi, G. P.. - In: ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 2366-004X. - 46:7(2021), pp. 3523-3524. [10.1007/s00261-021-02995-z]
Letter to the editor on “Ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for the treatment of aldosterone‑producing adenoma: a meta-analysis”
Sanga V.
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Iacobone M.;
2021
Abstract
Chen et al. meta-analyzed the studies comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), which is currently held to be the gold standard for the surgical treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) due to unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). They could include only fve small non-randomized retrospective studies, and, moreover, their meta-analysis was afected by several methodological faws and mistakes that, on the whole, question the validity of its results and the strength of its conclusions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Schiavone_Letter_2021.pdf
Open Access dal 23/06/2021
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
312.27 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
312.27 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.