To evaluate whether the administration of local anesthetic (LA) reduces pain in comparison with forced coughing (FC) for the execution of colposcopically guided biopsies (CGBs).

Objective: To evaluate whether the administration of local anesthetic (LA) reduces pain in comparison with forced coughing (FC) for the execution of colposcopically guided biopsies (CGBs). Study design: Data of 100 consecutive patients undergoing CGBs with the use of LA or FC were prospectively evaluated. Procedure-related pain was assessed with the use of a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Results: Fifty-one and 49 patients had CGBs using LA and FC, respectively. No between-group differences were observed in terms of pain related to speculum insertion, CGBs and pain recorded after the procedures (p > 0.05). However, patients in the LA group experienced pain related to cervical injection for administration of anesthesia (mean (±SD): 12.4 (±1.6)). Operative time was longer in the LA than in the FC group (7.2 (±0.2) vs. 5.0 (±0.1) min; p < 0.001). Conclusions: FC should be preferred over LA. Although CGB-related pain levels do not differ, the omission of intracervical injection is associated with undoubted advantages

Local anesthetic versus forced coughing at colposcopic-guided biopsy: a prospective study / Bogani, Giorgio; Serati, Maurizio; Cromi, Antonella; Di Naro, Edoardo; Casarin, Jvan; Pinelli, Ciro; Rossi, Thomas; Ghezzi, Fabio. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0301-2115. - 181:(2014), pp. 15-19. [10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.022]

Local anesthetic versus forced coughing at colposcopic-guided biopsy: a prospective study

BOGANI, GIORGIO;
2014

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the administration of local anesthetic (LA) reduces pain in comparison with forced coughing (FC) for the execution of colposcopically guided biopsies (CGBs). Study design: Data of 100 consecutive patients undergoing CGBs with the use of LA or FC were prospectively evaluated. Procedure-related pain was assessed with the use of a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Results: Fifty-one and 49 patients had CGBs using LA and FC, respectively. No between-group differences were observed in terms of pain related to speculum insertion, CGBs and pain recorded after the procedures (p > 0.05). However, patients in the LA group experienced pain related to cervical injection for administration of anesthesia (mean (±SD): 12.4 (±1.6)). Operative time was longer in the LA than in the FC group (7.2 (±0.2) vs. 5.0 (±0.1) min; p < 0.001). Conclusions: FC should be preferred over LA. Although CGB-related pain levels do not differ, the omission of intracervical injection is associated with undoubted advantages
2014
To evaluate whether the administration of local anesthetic (LA) reduces pain in comparison with forced coughing (FC) for the execution of colposcopically guided biopsies (CGBs).
Cervical biopsy; Cervical dysplasia; Colposcopy; Forced coughing; Local anesthesia; Adult; Aged; Biopsy; Cervix Uteri; Female; Humans; Injections; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Perception; Prospective Studies; Young Adult; Anesthesia; Local; Colposcopy; Cough
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Local anesthetic versus forced coughing at colposcopic-guided biopsy: a prospective study / Bogani, Giorgio; Serati, Maurizio; Cromi, Antonella; Di Naro, Edoardo; Casarin, Jvan; Pinelli, Ciro; Rossi, Thomas; Ghezzi, Fabio. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0301-2115. - 181:(2014), pp. 15-19. [10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.022]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1584320
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact