Objectives: This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of a standard antithrombotic strategy versus half-dose direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) after Watchman implantation. Background: No consensus currently exists on the selection of the most effective antithrombotic strategy to prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT) in patients undergoing endocardial left atrial appendage closure. Methods: After successful left atrial appendage closure, consecutive patients were prescribed a standard antithrombotic strategy (SAT) or long-term half-dose DOAC (hdDOAC). The primary composite endpoint was DRT and thromboembolic (TE) and bleeding events. Results: Overall, 555 patients (mean age 75 ± 8 years, 63% male; median CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category] score 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-6]; median HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol] score 3 [IQR: 2-4]) were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups (SAT: n = 357 vs hdDOAC: n = 198). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The median follow-up duration was 13 (IQR: 12-15) months. DRT occurred in 12 (2.1%) patients, all in the SAT group (3.4% vs 0.0%; log-rank P = 0.009). The risk of nonprocedural major bleeding was significantly more favorable in the hdDOAC group (0.5% vs. 3.9%; log-rank P = 0.018). The rate of the primary composite endpoint of DRT and TE and major bleeding events was 9.5% in SAT patients and 1.0% in hdDOAC patients (hazard ratio: 9.8; 95% confidence interval: 2.3-40.7; P = 0.002). Conclusions: After successful Watchman implantation, long-term half-dose DOAC significantly reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of DRT and TE and major bleeding events compared with a standard, antiplatelet-based, antithrombotic therapy.

Half-dose direct oral anticoagulation versus standard antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion / Della Rocca, D.G., Magnocavallo, M., Di Biase, L., Mohanty, S., Trivedi, C., Tarantino, N., Gianni, C., Lavalle, C., Van Niekerk, C.J., Romero, J., Briceño, D.F., Bassiouny, M., Al-Ahmad, A., Burkhardt, J.D., Natale, V.N., Gallinghouse, G.J., Del Prete, A., Forleo, G.B., Sanchez, J., Lakkireddy, D., et al.. - In: JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1936-8798. - 14:21(2021), pp. 2353-2364. [10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.031]

Half-dose direct oral anticoagulation versus standard antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion

Magnocavallo, Michele;Lavalle, Carlo;
2021

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of a standard antithrombotic strategy versus half-dose direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) after Watchman implantation. Background: No consensus currently exists on the selection of the most effective antithrombotic strategy to prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT) in patients undergoing endocardial left atrial appendage closure. Methods: After successful left atrial appendage closure, consecutive patients were prescribed a standard antithrombotic strategy (SAT) or long-term half-dose DOAC (hdDOAC). The primary composite endpoint was DRT and thromboembolic (TE) and bleeding events. Results: Overall, 555 patients (mean age 75 ± 8 years, 63% male; median CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category] score 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-6]; median HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol] score 3 [IQR: 2-4]) were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups (SAT: n = 357 vs hdDOAC: n = 198). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The median follow-up duration was 13 (IQR: 12-15) months. DRT occurred in 12 (2.1%) patients, all in the SAT group (3.4% vs 0.0%; log-rank P = 0.009). The risk of nonprocedural major bleeding was significantly more favorable in the hdDOAC group (0.5% vs. 3.9%; log-rank P = 0.018). The rate of the primary composite endpoint of DRT and TE and major bleeding events was 9.5% in SAT patients and 1.0% in hdDOAC patients (hazard ratio: 9.8; 95% confidence interval: 2.3-40.7; P = 0.002). Conclusions: After successful Watchman implantation, long-term half-dose DOAC significantly reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of DRT and TE and major bleeding events compared with a standard, antiplatelet-based, antithrombotic therapy.
2021
watchman; antiplatelet therapy; aspirin; left atrial appendage; oral anticoagulation; stroke; thromboembolism.
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Half-dose direct oral anticoagulation versus standard antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion / Della Rocca, D.G., Magnocavallo, M., Di Biase, L., Mohanty, S., Trivedi, C., Tarantino, N., Gianni, C., Lavalle, C., Van Niekerk, C.J., Romero, J., Briceño, D.F., Bassiouny, M., Al-Ahmad, A., Burkhardt, J.D., Natale, V.N., Gallinghouse, G.J., Del Prete, A., Forleo, G.B., Sanchez, J., Lakkireddy, D., et al.. - In: JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1936-8798. - 14:21(2021), pp. 2353-2364. [10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.031]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DellaRocca_Half-Dose_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.26 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.26 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1581517
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 48
  • Scopus 118
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 107
social impact