Background: New treatments are currently offering new opportunities and challenges in clinical management and research in the migraine field. There is the need of homogenous criteria to identify candidates for treatment escalation as well as of reliable criteria to identify refractoriness to treatment. To overcome those issues, the European Headache Federation (EHF) issued a Consensus document to propose criteria to approach difficult-to-treat migraine patients in a standardized way. The Consensus proposed well-defined criteria for resistant migraine (i.e., patients who do not respond to some treatment but who have residual therapeutic opportunities) and refractory migraine (i.e., patients who still have debilitating migraine despite maximal treatment efforts). The aim of this study was to better understand the perceived impact of resistant and refractory migraine and the attitude of physicians involved in migraine care toward those conditions. Methods: We conducted a web-questionnaire-based cross-sectional international study involving physicians with interest in headache care. Results: There were 277 questionnaires available for analysis. A relevant proportion of participants reported that patients with resistant and refractory migraine were frequently seen in their clinical practice (49.5% for resistant and 28.9% for refractory migraine); percentages were higher when considering only those working in specialized headache centers (75% and 46% respectively). However, many physicians reported low or moderate confidence in managing resistant (8.1% and 43.3%, respectively) and refractory (20.7% and 48.4%, respectively) migraine patients; confidence in treating resistant and refractory migraine patients was different according to the level of care and to the number of patients visited per week. Patients with resistant and refractory migraine were infrequently referred to more specialized centers (12% and 19%, respectively); also in this case, figures were different according to the level of care. Conclusions: This report highlights the clinical relevance of difficult-to-treat migraine and the presence of unmet needs in this field. There is the need of more evidence regarding the management of those patients and clear guidance referring to the organization of care and available opportunities.

Burden and attitude to resistant and refractory migraine. a survey from the European Headache Federation with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance / Sacco, S.; Lampl, C.; Maassen van den Brink, A.; Caponnetto, V.; Braschinsky, M.; Ducros, A.; Little, P.; Pozo-Rosich, P.; Reuter, U.; Ruiz de la Torre, E.; Sanchez Del Rio, M.; Sinclair, A. J.; Martelletti, P.; Katsarava, Z.; Cakciri, G.; Djamandi, P.; Grabova, S.; Halili, G.; Kruja, J.; Kuqo, A.; Naco, D.; Quka, A.; Stefanidhi, L.; Vyshka, G.; Zekja, I.; Bruera, O.; Gomez, D.; Guitian, B.; Roma, J. C.; Chen, I. L.; Bashirova, S.; Linkov, M.; Van Den Abbeele, D.; Vanderschueren, G.; Araujo, R.; Arruda, R.; Catharino, A.; Ciriaco, J.; Dalla Corte, A.; Dornas, R.; Felsenfeld, B.; Fonseca Taufner, A.; Fragoso, Y.; Hurtado, R.; Isoni Martins, D.; Londero, R.; Melo, L.; Mignoni, K. S.; Sgobbi De Souza, P. V.; Souza, M. N.; Osman, S.; Baltzer, V.; Pacheco Mosquera, L. F.; Dubroja, I.; Hucika, Z.; Lisak, M.; Lovrencic-Huzjan, A.; Lusic, I.; Mahovic Lakusic, D.; Mikulenka, P.; Rehulka, P.; Amin, F. M.; Antic, S.; Fakhril-Din, Z.; Moeller-Hansen, J.; Munksgaard, S.; Nan, A. M.; Pellesi, L.; Schytz, H.; Vides, M.; Braschinsky, K.; Krikmann, U.; Roos, C.; Cauchie, A.; Christian, L.; Guegan-Massardier, E.; Demarquay, G.; Gilles, G.; Mawet, J.; Kuhn, E.; Lanteri Minet, M.; Bustuchina Vlaicu, M.; Moisset, X.; Muresan, M.; Najjar-Ravan, M.; Giraud, P.; Simonin, S.; De Gaalon, S.; Chakhava, G.; Demuria, M.; Gegelashvili, G.; Kapanadze, N.; Antonakakis, A.; Gaul, C.; Forderreuther, S.; Huhn, J. -I.; Ibragimov, S.; Kamm, K.; Raffaelli, B.; Czaniera, R.; Ruscheweyh, R.; Gavanozi, E.; Karagiorgis, G.; Mavridism, T.; Ertsey, C.; Shubham, D.; Callista Tanowi, A. D.; Erdana Putra, S.; Hadi, D. W.; Kurnia, L.; Nasrul, M.; Albanese, M.; Antonaci, F.; Asioli, G. M.; Baschi, R.; Bentivegna, E.; Brunelli, N.; Caratozzolo, S.; Catarci, T.; Cherchi, A.; Corbelli, I.; Costa, A.; De Luca, C.; Doretti, A.; Favoni, V.; Ghiotto, N.; Giamberardino, M. A.; Giani, L.; Zanchin, G.; Govone, F.; Grillo, G.; Mampreso, E.; Negro, A.; Ornello, R.; Pasculli, M.; Pensato, U.; Prudenzano, M. P. A.; Quintana, S.; Rapisarda, R.; Romoli, M.; Russo, A.; Russo, M.; Sacco, S.; Spuntarelli, V.; Tiseo, C.; Torrente, A.; Vacca, A.; Vaula, G.; Vigano, A.; Vigneri, S.; Freimane, A.; Slosberga, E.; Zvaune, L.; Tan, H. J.; Fenech, C.; Cobilt-Catana, R.; De La Garza Neme, Y.; Martinez, M.; Proano Narvaez, J. V.; Rodriguez Herrera, A.; Vazquez, D.; Grosu, O.; Jakupi, A.; Kristoffersen, E. S.; Tronvik, E.; Winsvold, B. S.; Azhar, M.; Reyes Alvarez, M. T.; Vilchez Fernandez, L.; Dayrit, G. D.; Czapinska-Ciepiela, E. K.; Fila, M.; Gryglas-Dworak, A.; Couto, M.; Esperanca, P.; Ferreira, A.; Gil-Gouveia, R.; Goncalves, A.; Lopes, M.; Lourenco, M.; Machado, J.; Marinho, M.; Miranda, M. A.; Palavra, F.; Parreira, E.; Pavao Martins, I.; Pereira, L.; Pereira Monteiro, J. M.; Leahu, P.; Aloman, S.; Abramova, E.; Akhmadeeva, L.; Belopasova, A.; Bogdanova, I.; Chernyak, M.; Epifanova, M.; Fedorova, E.; Felbush, A.; Karpova, M.; Korobkova, D.; Korotkova, D.; Latysheva, N.; Makeeva, T.; Mikhalkina, K.; Osipova, V.; Roshchina, O.; Serga, A.; Serousova, O. V.; Sidorova, Y.; Skiba, I.; Skorobogatykh, K.; Vashchenko, N.; Apostolski, S.; Buder, N.; Kopitovic, A.; Mirjana, J.; Podgorac, A.; Rakic, D.; Simic, S.; Zarko, M.; Trajkovic, J. Z.; Beltran-Blasco, I.; Calabria Gallego, M. D.; Diaz Insa, S.; Ezpeleta, D.; Fernandez, M.; Garcia-Azorin, D.; Gonzalez-Garcia, N.; Guerrero, A. L.; Guillamon, E.; Herreros Rodriguez, J.; Layos-Romero, A.; Medrano, V.; Minguez-Olaondo, A.; Navarro Munoz, S.; Pare Curell, M.; Ruibal, M.; Sanchez Alvarez, J. M.; Santos, S.; Soler, R.; Viguera, J.; Zabalza, R.; Abdelrahman, T.; Abobaker Hamza, S. B.; Mustafa, M. N.; Edvinsson, L.; Gantenbein, A.; Maraffi, I.; Couturier, E.; Dirkx, T.; Hoebert, M.; Van Oosterhout, W.; Wim, M.; Zwartbol, R.; Bakir, M.; Demirel, H.; Erdemoglu, A. K.; Ertem, D. H.; Gonullu, S.; Ilgaz Aydinlar, E.; Inan, L. E.; Olmez, B.; Ozbenli, T.; Ozge, A.; Uluduz, D.; Uyar Cankay, T.; Yalinay Dikmen, P.; Saxena, A. B.; Bozhenko, M.; Bozhenko, N.; Bubnov, R.; Tsurkalenko, O.; Abu-Arafeh, I.; Idrovo, L.; Miller, S.; Nirmalananthan, N.; Sinclair, A.; Taleti, E.; Valori, A.; Whitehouse, W.; Zermansky, A.; Thura, M.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN. - ISSN 1129-2369. - 22:1(2021). [10.1186/s10194-021-01252-4]

Burden and attitude to resistant and refractory migraine. a survey from the European Headache Federation with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance

Martelletti P.;Katsarava Z.;Halili G.;Gomez D.;Antonaci F.;Bentivegna E.;Catarci T.;Giamberardino M. A.;Giani L.;Negro A.;Spuntarelli V.;Fernandez M.;Valori A.;
2021

Abstract

Background: New treatments are currently offering new opportunities and challenges in clinical management and research in the migraine field. There is the need of homogenous criteria to identify candidates for treatment escalation as well as of reliable criteria to identify refractoriness to treatment. To overcome those issues, the European Headache Federation (EHF) issued a Consensus document to propose criteria to approach difficult-to-treat migraine patients in a standardized way. The Consensus proposed well-defined criteria for resistant migraine (i.e., patients who do not respond to some treatment but who have residual therapeutic opportunities) and refractory migraine (i.e., patients who still have debilitating migraine despite maximal treatment efforts). The aim of this study was to better understand the perceived impact of resistant and refractory migraine and the attitude of physicians involved in migraine care toward those conditions. Methods: We conducted a web-questionnaire-based cross-sectional international study involving physicians with interest in headache care. Results: There were 277 questionnaires available for analysis. A relevant proportion of participants reported that patients with resistant and refractory migraine were frequently seen in their clinical practice (49.5% for resistant and 28.9% for refractory migraine); percentages were higher when considering only those working in specialized headache centers (75% and 46% respectively). However, many physicians reported low or moderate confidence in managing resistant (8.1% and 43.3%, respectively) and refractory (20.7% and 48.4%, respectively) migraine patients; confidence in treating resistant and refractory migraine patients was different according to the level of care and to the number of patients visited per week. Patients with resistant and refractory migraine were infrequently referred to more specialized centers (12% and 19%, respectively); also in this case, figures were different according to the level of care. Conclusions: This report highlights the clinical relevance of difficult-to-treat migraine and the presence of unmet needs in this field. There is the need of more evidence regarding the management of those patients and clear guidance referring to the organization of care and available opportunities.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Sacco_Burden_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.31 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1579081
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact