The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of FTD SARS-CoV-2 compared to the RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0. The analysis of 100 nasopharyngeal swabs showed an overall agreement of 88 %. The positive percentage agreement was 85.6 % and the negative percentage agreement was 91 %. In conclusion we observed a substantial agreement among the two methods, with discrepancies mainly observed in specimens with relatively low amount of viral RNA.

Comparison of FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay and RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 / Di Carlo, D.; Mazzuti, L.; Sciandra, I.; Guerrizio, G.; Oliveto, G.; Riveros Cabral, R. J.; Zingaropoli, M. A.; Turriziani, O.. - In: JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS. - ISSN 0166-0934. - 298:(2021), pp. 1-3. [10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114276]

Comparison of FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay and RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

Mazzuti L.;Guerrizio G.;Oliveto G.;Riveros Cabral R. J.;Zingaropoli M. A.;Turriziani O.
2021

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of FTD SARS-CoV-2 compared to the RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0. The analysis of 100 nasopharyngeal swabs showed an overall agreement of 88 %. The positive percentage agreement was 85.6 % and the negative percentage agreement was 91 %. In conclusion we observed a substantial agreement among the two methods, with discrepancies mainly observed in specimens with relatively low amount of viral RNA.
2021
covid-19; ct values; ftd sars-cov-2; realstar rt-pcr; rt-pcr; sars-cov-2
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Comparison of FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay and RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 / Di Carlo, D.; Mazzuti, L.; Sciandra, I.; Guerrizio, G.; Oliveto, G.; Riveros Cabral, R. J.; Zingaropoli, M. A.; Turriziani, O.. - In: JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS. - ISSN 0166-0934. - 298:(2021), pp. 1-3. [10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114276]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Di Carlo_postprint_Comparison_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 748.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
748.31 kB Adobe PDF
Di Carlo_Comparison_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 700.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
700.29 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1574431
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact