Object. The following study was carried out in order to evaluate through guidelines the best evidence in occupational therapy for daily activities and quality of life of patients with hip prostheses. Methods. Recommendations were generated following the grading method of the National Program for Guidelines/National System Guidelines (PNLG-SNLG), a system for developing guidelines for recommendations in clinical practice. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) tool was also applied. Results. A total of seven studies were included in this research: one randomized controlled trial, two systematic reviews, two outcomes research studies, and two observational studies. We found that, for the three clinical questions we proposed, more research on the effectiveness of treatments is required. Conclusions. The evidence resulting from this study is not sufficient to determine whether the rehabilitation techniques under consideration are effective.
Evaluating best evidence in occupational therapy for patients with hip replacement: guidelines / Galeoto, Giovanni; Addolorato, Marta; Porco, Sabrina; Tancioni, Federico; Gagliardi, Marco; Fabbrini, Giovanni; Tofani, Marco; Sansoni, Julita; Mollica, Roberta; Berardi, Anna; De Santis, Rita. - In: GIORNALE ITALIANO DI MEDICINA DEL LAVORO ED ERGONOMIA. - ISSN 1592-7830. - 43:2(2021), p. 144-149.
Evaluating best evidence in occupational therapy for patients with hip replacement: guidelines
Galeoto, Giovanni;Tancioni, Federico;Fabbrini, Giovanni;Tofani, Marco;Sansoni, Julita;Mollica, Roberta;Berardi, Anna;De Santis, Rita
2021
Abstract
Object. The following study was carried out in order to evaluate through guidelines the best evidence in occupational therapy for daily activities and quality of life of patients with hip prostheses. Methods. Recommendations were generated following the grading method of the National Program for Guidelines/National System Guidelines (PNLG-SNLG), a system for developing guidelines for recommendations in clinical practice. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) tool was also applied. Results. A total of seven studies were included in this research: one randomized controlled trial, two systematic reviews, two outcomes research studies, and two observational studies. We found that, for the three clinical questions we proposed, more research on the effectiveness of treatments is required. Conclusions. The evidence resulting from this study is not sufficient to determine whether the rehabilitation techniques under consideration are effective.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Galeoto_Evaluating best evidence_2021.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
671.36 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
671.36 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.