BACKGROUND: A lack of evidence on the reliability limits the utility of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) in individuals affected by stroke both in clinical and research settings. AIM: To examine the test-retest reliability and the inter-rater reliability of the SFGS in patients affected by subacute stroke. DESIGN: A repeated-assessments design (fifteen days apart) was used to examine the test-retest reliability of the SFGS. SETTING: Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit. POPULATION: Thirty-two inpatients with subacute stroke. METHODS: Thirty-two inpatients with subacute stroke participated in the test-retest reliability study. All patients were video recorded in sitting position and uncovered face for about two minutes, in static position to evaluate symmetry at rest, then assessing symmetry of voluntary move- ment and synkinesis. For the inter-rater reliability, fifteen experts in neurorehabilitation were selected as raters. The facial function was assessed using the Italian version of the SFGS was used as grading system on a recorded video of each patient. The inter-rater reliability was carried out through the ICC, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, while the intra-rater reliability was assessed comparing for each rater the scores evaluated at T0 and T1 using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Evaluations at T0 and T1 showed a significant correlation with a total ICC (T0+T1) of 0.901 (95% CI: 0.852-0.942; P<0.001). The ICC of T0 scores is 0.914 (95% CI: 0.869-0.950; P<0.001), while the ICC of T1 scores is 0.886 (95% CI: 0.829-0.995; P<0.001). The scores of the “voluntary movement symmetry” area is correlated with ICC of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.835-0.958; P<0.001). The scores of the “resting symmetry” area show correlation with ICC of 0.567 (95% CI: 0.277-0.762; P<0.001). The area of “synkinesis” shows a lower correlation with ICC of 0.175 (95% CI: -0.180-0.489; P<0.001). The scores attributed to the patients in the two different moments of observation resulted not significantly different from 12 out of 15 raters. CONCLUSIONS: The SFGS resulted reliable in its overall score to assess the facial palsy also in patients affected by stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The findings of this study provide empirical evidence of reliable properties of the SFGS for assessing central facial palsy in patients with stroke.

Sunnybrook facial grading system reliability in subacute stroke patients / Tramontano, Marco; Morone, Giovanni; LA Greca, Federica M; Marchegiani, Valeria; Palomba, Angela; Iosa, Marco; Musto, Giulia; Simonelli, Marilia. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 1973-9095. - 57:5(2021), pp. 685-690. [10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06629-6]

Sunnybrook facial grading system reliability in subacute stroke patients

Iosa, Marco;
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A lack of evidence on the reliability limits the utility of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) in individuals affected by stroke both in clinical and research settings. AIM: To examine the test-retest reliability and the inter-rater reliability of the SFGS in patients affected by subacute stroke. DESIGN: A repeated-assessments design (fifteen days apart) was used to examine the test-retest reliability of the SFGS. SETTING: Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit. POPULATION: Thirty-two inpatients with subacute stroke. METHODS: Thirty-two inpatients with subacute stroke participated in the test-retest reliability study. All patients were video recorded in sitting position and uncovered face for about two minutes, in static position to evaluate symmetry at rest, then assessing symmetry of voluntary move- ment and synkinesis. For the inter-rater reliability, fifteen experts in neurorehabilitation were selected as raters. The facial function was assessed using the Italian version of the SFGS was used as grading system on a recorded video of each patient. The inter-rater reliability was carried out through the ICC, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, while the intra-rater reliability was assessed comparing for each rater the scores evaluated at T0 and T1 using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Evaluations at T0 and T1 showed a significant correlation with a total ICC (T0+T1) of 0.901 (95% CI: 0.852-0.942; P<0.001). The ICC of T0 scores is 0.914 (95% CI: 0.869-0.950; P<0.001), while the ICC of T1 scores is 0.886 (95% CI: 0.829-0.995; P<0.001). The scores of the “voluntary movement symmetry” area is correlated with ICC of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.835-0.958; P<0.001). The scores of the “resting symmetry” area show correlation with ICC of 0.567 (95% CI: 0.277-0.762; P<0.001). The area of “synkinesis” shows a lower correlation with ICC of 0.175 (95% CI: -0.180-0.489; P<0.001). The scores attributed to the patients in the two different moments of observation resulted not significantly different from 12 out of 15 raters. CONCLUSIONS: The SFGS resulted reliable in its overall score to assess the facial palsy also in patients affected by stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The findings of this study provide empirical evidence of reliable properties of the SFGS for assessing central facial palsy in patients with stroke.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Tramontano_postprint_Sunnybrook_2021.pdf

embargo fino al 09/06/2022

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri PDF
Tramontano_Sunnybrook_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 357.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
357.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1572351
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact