Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the first-line treatment for major depressive disorder. It has been recently proposed that these drugs, by enhancing neural plasticity, amplify the influences of the living conditions on mood. Consequently, SSRI outcome depends on the quality of the environment, improving symptomatology mainly in individuals living in favorable conditions. In adverse conditions, drugs with a different mechanism of action might have higher efficacy. The antibiotic minocycline, with neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties, has been recently proposed as a novel potential antidepressant treatment. To explore the drug-by-environment interaction, we compared the effects on depressive-like behavior and neural plasticity of the SSRI fluoxetine and minocycline in enriched and stressful conditions. We first exposed C57BL/6 adult female mice to 14 days of chronic unpredictable mild stress to induce a depressive-like profile. Afterward, mice received vehicle, fluoxetine, or minocycline for 21 days, while exposed to either enriched or stressful conditions. During the first five days, fluoxetine led to an improvement in enrichment but not in stress. By contrast, minocycline led to an improvement in both conditions. After 21 days, all groups showed a significant improvement in enrichment while fluoxetine worsened the depressive like behavior in stress. The effects of the drugs on neural plasticity, measured as long-term potentiation, were also environment-dependent. Overall, we show that the environment affects fluoxetine but not minocycline outcome, indicating that the latter represents a potential alternative to SSRIs to treat depressed patients living in adverse conditions. From a translation perspective, our finding call for considering the drug-by-environment interaction to select the most effective pharmacological treatment.

Selecting antidepressants according to a drug-by-environment interaction: a comparison of fluoxetine and minocycline effects in mice living either in enriched or stressful conditions / Poggini, Silvia; Matte Bon, Gloria; Golia, MARIA TERESA; Ciano Albanese, Naomi; Viglione, Aurelia; Poleggi, Anna; Limatola, Cristina; Maggi, Laura; Branchi, Igor. - In: BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH. - ISSN 0166-4328. - 408:(2021). [10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113256]

Selecting antidepressants according to a drug-by-environment interaction: a comparison of fluoxetine and minocycline effects in mice living either in enriched or stressful conditions.

Maria Teresa Golia;Naomi Ciano Albanese;Cristina Limatola
Investigation
;
Laura Maggi
Conceptualization
;
2021

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the first-line treatment for major depressive disorder. It has been recently proposed that these drugs, by enhancing neural plasticity, amplify the influences of the living conditions on mood. Consequently, SSRI outcome depends on the quality of the environment, improving symptomatology mainly in individuals living in favorable conditions. In adverse conditions, drugs with a different mechanism of action might have higher efficacy. The antibiotic minocycline, with neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties, has been recently proposed as a novel potential antidepressant treatment. To explore the drug-by-environment interaction, we compared the effects on depressive-like behavior and neural plasticity of the SSRI fluoxetine and minocycline in enriched and stressful conditions. We first exposed C57BL/6 adult female mice to 14 days of chronic unpredictable mild stress to induce a depressive-like profile. Afterward, mice received vehicle, fluoxetine, or minocycline for 21 days, while exposed to either enriched or stressful conditions. During the first five days, fluoxetine led to an improvement in enrichment but not in stress. By contrast, minocycline led to an improvement in both conditions. After 21 days, all groups showed a significant improvement in enrichment while fluoxetine worsened the depressive like behavior in stress. The effects of the drugs on neural plasticity, measured as long-term potentiation, were also environment-dependent. Overall, we show that the environment affects fluoxetine but not minocycline outcome, indicating that the latter represents a potential alternative to SSRIs to treat depressed patients living in adverse conditions. From a translation perspective, our finding call for considering the drug-by-environment interaction to select the most effective pharmacological treatment.
2021
depression; neural plasticity; SSRIs; minocycline; female mice
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Selecting antidepressants according to a drug-by-environment interaction: a comparison of fluoxetine and minocycline effects in mice living either in enriched or stressful conditions / Poggini, Silvia; Matte Bon, Gloria; Golia, MARIA TERESA; Ciano Albanese, Naomi; Viglione, Aurelia; Poleggi, Anna; Limatola, Cristina; Maggi, Laura; Branchi, Igor. - In: BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH. - ISSN 0166-4328. - 408:(2021). [10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113256]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Poggini_Selecting-antidepressants_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.67 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1571591
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact