The processing of hedonic aspects of touch, namely affective touch, is associated with the activation of C-Tactile (CT) fibers. CTs were thought to be present only in hairy skin, with glabrous skin being often used as control site in affective touch studies. Nevertheless, several articles comparing pleasantness perception across hairy and glabrous skin reported no significant differences. Surprisingly, CT fibers have also been recently detected on the glabrous palm, further questioning whether affective touch perception across both hairy and glabrous skin is comparable. The present meta-analysis thus aimed to quantify pleasantness perception of affective tactile stimulations on both hairy and glabrous sites. Pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) from 18 studies were analyzed using random effect models. No systematic preference towards affective stimulations on hairy or glabrous skin was observed. Moreover, studies were highly heterogeneous, suggesting high variance in the results of the retrieved articles. Results were not affected by publication bias nor by other moderators. Variables affecting affective touch perception on hairy and glabrous skin and methodological considerations were discussed.

Pleasantness ratings in response to affective touch across hairy and glabrous skin: a meta-analysis / Cruciani, Gianluca; Zanini, Ludovica; Russo, Valentina; Boccardi, Erika; Spitoni, Grazia Fernanda. - In: NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS. - ISSN 0149-7634. - 131:(2021), pp. 88-95. [10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.026]

Pleasantness ratings in response to affective touch across hairy and glabrous skin: a meta-analysis

Cruciani, Gianluca
Co-primo
;
Zanini, Ludovica
Co-primo
;
Russo, Valentina;Boccardi, Erika;Spitoni, Grazia Fernanda
2021

Abstract

The processing of hedonic aspects of touch, namely affective touch, is associated with the activation of C-Tactile (CT) fibers. CTs were thought to be present only in hairy skin, with glabrous skin being often used as control site in affective touch studies. Nevertheless, several articles comparing pleasantness perception across hairy and glabrous skin reported no significant differences. Surprisingly, CT fibers have also been recently detected on the glabrous palm, further questioning whether affective touch perception across both hairy and glabrous skin is comparable. The present meta-analysis thus aimed to quantify pleasantness perception of affective tactile stimulations on both hairy and glabrous sites. Pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) from 18 studies were analyzed using random effect models. No systematic preference towards affective stimulations on hairy or glabrous skin was observed. Moreover, studies were highly heterogeneous, suggesting high variance in the results of the retrieved articles. Results were not affected by publication bias nor by other moderators. Variables affecting affective touch perception on hairy and glabrous skin and methodological considerations were discussed.
2021
affective touch; CT fibers; gentle touch; glabrous skin; hairy skin; pleasant touch
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Pleasantness ratings in response to affective touch across hairy and glabrous skin: a meta-analysis / Cruciani, Gianluca; Zanini, Ludovica; Russo, Valentina; Boccardi, Erika; Spitoni, Grazia Fernanda. - In: NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS. - ISSN 0149-7634. - 131:(2021), pp. 88-95. [10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.026]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cruciani_Pleasantness-ratings_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.25 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1569947
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact