Objectives: Remdesivir is currently approved for the treatment of COVID-19. The recom-mendation for using remdesivir in patients with COVID-19 was based on the in vitro and in vivo activity of this drug against SARS-CoV-2. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted on a population of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The primary endpoint of this study was the impact of remdesivir-containing therapy on 30-day mortality; the secondary endpoint was the impact of remdesivir-containing therapy on the need for high-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), or mechanical ventilation. The data were analyzed after propensity score matching. Results: A total of 407 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were con-secutively enrolled. Out of these, 294 (72.2%) were treated with remdesivir and 113 (27.8%) were not. Overall, 61 patients (14.9%) were treated during hospitalization with HFNC, NIV, or mechanical ventilation, while 30-day mortality was observed in 21 patients (5.2%). Univariate analysis of patients treated with remdesivir or not showed no differences in 30-day mortality (4% vs. 6%, p = 0.411) in the two study groups. Cox regression analysis, after propensity score matching, showed that therapies, including remdesivir-containing therapy, were not statistically associated with 30-day survival or mortality. The Kaplan–Meier curves of 30-day survival in patients treated with remdesivir or not before (p = 0.24) and after (p = 0.88) propensity score matching showed no differences between the two study groups. Finally, patients treated with remdesivir or not showed the same need for HFNC/NIV or mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: This real-life experience of remdesivir use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was not associated with significant increases in rates of survival or reduced use of HFNC/NIV or mechanical ventilation compared with patients treated with other therapies not including remdesivir.

Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A prospective clinical experience / Russo, A.; Binetti, E.; Borrazzo, C.; Cacciola, E. G.; Battistini, L.; Ceccarelli, G.; Mastroianni, C. M.; D'Ettorre, G.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 10:17(2021), pp. 1-9. [10.3390/jcm10173784]

Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A prospective clinical experience

Binetti E.;Borrazzo C.;Battistini L.;Mastroianni C. M.;D'ettorre G.
2021

Abstract

Objectives: Remdesivir is currently approved for the treatment of COVID-19. The recom-mendation for using remdesivir in patients with COVID-19 was based on the in vitro and in vivo activity of this drug against SARS-CoV-2. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted on a population of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The primary endpoint of this study was the impact of remdesivir-containing therapy on 30-day mortality; the secondary endpoint was the impact of remdesivir-containing therapy on the need for high-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), or mechanical ventilation. The data were analyzed after propensity score matching. Results: A total of 407 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were con-secutively enrolled. Out of these, 294 (72.2%) were treated with remdesivir and 113 (27.8%) were not. Overall, 61 patients (14.9%) were treated during hospitalization with HFNC, NIV, or mechanical ventilation, while 30-day mortality was observed in 21 patients (5.2%). Univariate analysis of patients treated with remdesivir or not showed no differences in 30-day mortality (4% vs. 6%, p = 0.411) in the two study groups. Cox regression analysis, after propensity score matching, showed that therapies, including remdesivir-containing therapy, were not statistically associated with 30-day survival or mortality. The Kaplan–Meier curves of 30-day survival in patients treated with remdesivir or not before (p = 0.24) and after (p = 0.88) propensity score matching showed no differences between the two study groups. Finally, patients treated with remdesivir or not showed the same need for HFNC/NIV or mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: This real-life experience of remdesivir use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was not associated with significant increases in rates of survival or reduced use of HFNC/NIV or mechanical ventilation compared with patients treated with other therapies not including remdesivir.
2021
covid-19; mechanical ventilation; non-invasive ventilation; pneumonia; remdesivir
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A prospective clinical experience / Russo, A.; Binetti, E.; Borrazzo, C.; Cacciola, E. G.; Battistini, L.; Ceccarelli, G.; Mastroianni, C. M.; D'Ettorre, G.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 10:17(2021), pp. 1-9. [10.3390/jcm10173784]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Russo_Efficacy_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 332.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
332.33 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1568790
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact