Background: Despite that the unfavorable prognostic role of a high Total Metabolic Tumor Volume (TMTV) in Follicular Lymphoma has been demonstrated, the role of SUVmax alone at baseline PET/CT could have a different prognostic role. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational monocentric cohort study. All patients affected by FL who underwent a basal PET/CT were included. Two subgroups were identified and compared in terms of PFS and OS: (A) Basal SUVmax ≤ 6; and (B) Basal SUVmax > 6. Results: Ninety-four patients were included, 34 in group A (36.2%) and 60 in group B (63.8%). The PFS at two years was comparable in the two groups (97%). The five-year PFS was 73.5% for group A and 95% for group B (p 0.005). The five-year PFS in the whole cohort was 87.5%. A clear advantage was confirmed in group A in the absence of other risk factors. Patients with SUVmax ≤ 6 and no risk factors showed a 5-year PFS of 73% against 83% for patients with SUVmax > 6 and at least two risk factors. Conclusion: A high FDG uptake favorably correlated with PFS. A low basal SUVmax reflected a higher rate of late relapse requiring a prolonged follow-up. The basal SUVmax is an approachable parameter with prognostic implications.

High basal maximal standardized uptake value (Suvmax) in follicular lymphoma identifies patients with a low risk of long-term relapse / Assanto, G. M.; Ciotti, G.; Brescini, M.; De Luca, M. L.; Annechini, G.; D'Elia, G. M.; Agrippino, R.; Del Giudice, I.; Martelli, M.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Pulsoni, A.. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 13:12(2021). [10.3390/cancers13122876]

High basal maximal standardized uptake value (Suvmax) in follicular lymphoma identifies patients with a low risk of long-term relapse

Assanto G. M.;Ciotti G.;Brescini M.;De Luca M. L.;Annechini G.;Agrippino R.;Del Giudice I.;Martelli M.;Chiaravalloti A.;Pulsoni A.
2021

Abstract

Background: Despite that the unfavorable prognostic role of a high Total Metabolic Tumor Volume (TMTV) in Follicular Lymphoma has been demonstrated, the role of SUVmax alone at baseline PET/CT could have a different prognostic role. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational monocentric cohort study. All patients affected by FL who underwent a basal PET/CT were included. Two subgroups were identified and compared in terms of PFS and OS: (A) Basal SUVmax ≤ 6; and (B) Basal SUVmax > 6. Results: Ninety-four patients were included, 34 in group A (36.2%) and 60 in group B (63.8%). The PFS at two years was comparable in the two groups (97%). The five-year PFS was 73.5% for group A and 95% for group B (p 0.005). The five-year PFS in the whole cohort was 87.5%. A clear advantage was confirmed in group A in the absence of other risk factors. Patients with SUVmax ≤ 6 and no risk factors showed a 5-year PFS of 73% against 83% for patients with SUVmax > 6 and at least two risk factors. Conclusion: A high FDG uptake favorably correlated with PFS. A low basal SUVmax reflected a higher rate of late relapse requiring a prolonged follow-up. The basal SUVmax is an approachable parameter with prognostic implications.
2021
follicular lymphoma; lymphoma; lymphoproliferative disease; PET-SCAN; SUV
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
High basal maximal standardized uptake value (Suvmax) in follicular lymphoma identifies patients with a low risk of long-term relapse / Assanto, G. M.; Ciotti, G.; Brescini, M.; De Luca, M. L.; Annechini, G.; D'Elia, G. M.; Agrippino, R.; Del Giudice, I.; Martelli, M.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Pulsoni, A.. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 13:12(2021). [10.3390/cancers13122876]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Assanto_Follicular-lymphoma_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.49 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1567637
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact