Human-carnivore conflicts are a major conservation issue. As bears are expanding their range in Europe’s human-modified landscapes, it is increasingly important to understand, prevent, and address human-bear conflicts and evaluate mitigation strategies in areas of historical coexis-tence. Based on verified claims, we assessed costs, patterns, and drivers of bear damages in the relict Apennine brown bear population in the Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park (PNALM), central Italy. During 2005–2015, 203 ± 71 (SD) damage events were verified annually, equivalent to 75,987 ± 30,038 €/year paid for compensation. Most damages occurred in summer and fall, with livestock depredation, especially sheep and cattle calves, prevailing over other types of damages, with apiaries ranking second in costs of compensation. Transhumant livestock owners were less impacted than residential ones, and farms that adopted prevention measures loaned from the PNALM were less susceptible to bear damages. Livestock farms chronically damaged by bears represented 8 ± 3% of those annually impacted, corresponding to 24 ± 6% of compensation costs. Further improvements in the conflict mitigation policy adopted by the PNALM include integrated prevention, conditional compensation, and participatory processes. We discuss the implications of our study for Human-bear coexistence in broader contexts.

Cost of coexisting with a relict large carnivore population: Impact of apennine brown bears, 2005–2015 / Galluzzi, A.; Donfrancesco, V.; Mastrantonio, G.; Sulli, C.; Ciucci, P.. - In: ANIMALS. - ISSN 2076-2615. - 11:5(2021), pp. 1-18. [10.3390/ani11051453]

Cost of coexisting with a relict large carnivore population: Impact of apennine brown bears, 2005–2015

Galluzzi A.;Ciucci P.
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Human-carnivore conflicts are a major conservation issue. As bears are expanding their range in Europe’s human-modified landscapes, it is increasingly important to understand, prevent, and address human-bear conflicts and evaluate mitigation strategies in areas of historical coexis-tence. Based on verified claims, we assessed costs, patterns, and drivers of bear damages in the relict Apennine brown bear population in the Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park (PNALM), central Italy. During 2005–2015, 203 ± 71 (SD) damage events were verified annually, equivalent to 75,987 ± 30,038 €/year paid for compensation. Most damages occurred in summer and fall, with livestock depredation, especially sheep and cattle calves, prevailing over other types of damages, with apiaries ranking second in costs of compensation. Transhumant livestock owners were less impacted than residential ones, and farms that adopted prevention measures loaned from the PNALM were less susceptible to bear damages. Livestock farms chronically damaged by bears represented 8 ± 3% of those annually impacted, corresponding to 24 ± 6% of compensation costs. Further improvements in the conflict mitigation policy adopted by the PNALM include integrated prevention, conditional compensation, and participatory processes. We discuss the implications of our study for Human-bear coexistence in broader contexts.
2021
Compensation costs; Human-bear conflict; Human-carnivore coexistence; Human-dominated landscape; Italy; Large carnivores; Ursus arctos
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Cost of coexisting with a relict large carnivore population: Impact of apennine brown bears, 2005–2015 / Galluzzi, A.; Donfrancesco, V.; Mastrantonio, G.; Sulli, C.; Ciucci, P.. - In: ANIMALS. - ISSN 2076-2615. - 11:5(2021), pp. 1-18. [10.3390/ani11051453]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Galluzzi_Cost_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1453
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.92 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.92 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1564121
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact