Background: The five facets mindfulness questionnaire-short form (FFMQ-SF) is a new, brief measure for the assessment of mindfulness skills in clinical and nonclinical samples. The construct validity of the FFMQ-SF has not been previously assessed in community samples. Aims: The present study investigated the factor structure of the Italian version of the FFMQ-SF. Method: Structured equation modeling was used to test the fit of three alternative models in a sample of highly educated adults (n = 211). Results: A hierarchical model with a single second-order factor loaded by observing, describing, and acting with awareness (i.e. the mindfulness “what” skills) performed slightly better than both a five-factor model with correlated factors and a hierarchical model with a general second-order factor. The FFMQ-SF scores were significantly higher than those reported in both Dutch depressed patients and Australian undergraduate students for all facets (but nonreactivity for the Australian sample). Conclusions: Data support the multifaceted nature of mindfulness skills. Because of its brevity and simplicity of use, the FFMQ-SF is a promising questionnaire in longitudinal and clinical research. This questionnaire can serve as a guideline to help clinicians assess and monitor mindfulness skills acquisition, strengthening, and generalization, and prioritize mindfulness skills that need immediate attention.

The assessment of mindfulness skills: the “what” and the “how” / Iani, Luca; Lauriola, Marco; Cafaro, Valentina. - In: JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0963-8237. - 29:2(2017), pp. 144-151. [10.1080/09638237.2017.1385738]

The assessment of mindfulness skills: the “what” and the “how”

Lauriola, Marco
Methodology
;
Cafaro, Valentina
Data Curation
2017

Abstract

Background: The five facets mindfulness questionnaire-short form (FFMQ-SF) is a new, brief measure for the assessment of mindfulness skills in clinical and nonclinical samples. The construct validity of the FFMQ-SF has not been previously assessed in community samples. Aims: The present study investigated the factor structure of the Italian version of the FFMQ-SF. Method: Structured equation modeling was used to test the fit of three alternative models in a sample of highly educated adults (n = 211). Results: A hierarchical model with a single second-order factor loaded by observing, describing, and acting with awareness (i.e. the mindfulness “what” skills) performed slightly better than both a five-factor model with correlated factors and a hierarchical model with a general second-order factor. The FFMQ-SF scores were significantly higher than those reported in both Dutch depressed patients and Australian undergraduate students for all facets (but nonreactivity for the Australian sample). Conclusions: Data support the multifaceted nature of mindfulness skills. Because of its brevity and simplicity of use, the FFMQ-SF is a promising questionnaire in longitudinal and clinical research. This questionnaire can serve as a guideline to help clinicians assess and monitor mindfulness skills acquisition, strengthening, and generalization, and prioritize mindfulness skills that need immediate attention.
2017
Mindfulness; construct validity; assessment; five-facet; mindfulness questionnaire; dialectical behavior; therapy; “what” skills
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The assessment of mindfulness skills: the “what” and the “how” / Iani, Luca; Lauriola, Marco; Cafaro, Valentina. - In: JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0963-8237. - 29:2(2017), pp. 144-151. [10.1080/09638237.2017.1385738]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lauriola_Mindfulness-skills_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 524.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
524.57 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1561406
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact