Spatial memory has been studied through different instruments and tools with different modalities of administration. The cognitive load varies depending on the measure used and it should be taken into account to correctly interpret results. The aim of this research was to analyze how men and women perform three different spatial memory tasks with the same spatial context but with different cognitive demands. A total of 287 undergraduate students from the University of Almeria (Spain) and the University of L’Aquila (Italy) participated in the study. They were divided into three groups balanced by sex according to the spatial memory test they performed: the Walking Space Boxes Room Task (WSBRT), the Almeria Spatial Memory Recognition Test (ASMRT) and the Non-Walking Space Boxes Room Task (NWSBRT). Time spent and number of errors/correct answers were registered for analysis. In relation to the WSBRT and the ASMRT, men were faster and reached the optimal level of performance before women. In the three tests, familiarity with the spatial context helped to reduce the number of errors, regardless of the level of difficulty. In conclusion, sex differences were determined by the familiarity with the spatial context, the difficulty level of the task, the active or passive role of the participant and the amount of visual information provided in each screen shot.

Sex differences in spatial memory: Comparison of three tasks using the same virtual context / Tascon, L.; Di Cicco, C.; Piccardi, L.; Palmiero, M.; Bocchi, A.; Cimadevilla, J. M.. - In: BRAIN SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3425. - 11:6(2021), p. 757. [10.3390/brainsci11060757]

Sex differences in spatial memory: Comparison of three tasks using the same virtual context

Piccardi L.;Bocchi A.;
2021

Abstract

Spatial memory has been studied through different instruments and tools with different modalities of administration. The cognitive load varies depending on the measure used and it should be taken into account to correctly interpret results. The aim of this research was to analyze how men and women perform three different spatial memory tasks with the same spatial context but with different cognitive demands. A total of 287 undergraduate students from the University of Almeria (Spain) and the University of L’Aquila (Italy) participated in the study. They were divided into three groups balanced by sex according to the spatial memory test they performed: the Walking Space Boxes Room Task (WSBRT), the Almeria Spatial Memory Recognition Test (ASMRT) and the Non-Walking Space Boxes Room Task (NWSBRT). Time spent and number of errors/correct answers were registered for analysis. In relation to the WSBRT and the ASMRT, men were faster and reached the optimal level of performance before women. In the three tests, familiarity with the spatial context helped to reduce the number of errors, regardless of the level of difficulty. In conclusion, sex differences were determined by the familiarity with the spatial context, the difficulty level of the task, the active or passive role of the participant and the amount of visual information provided in each screen shot.
2021
Cognitive load; Dimorphism; Sex differences; Spatial navigation; Spatial orientation; Spatial tests; Virtual reality
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Sex differences in spatial memory: Comparison of three tasks using the same virtual context / Tascon, L.; Di Cicco, C.; Piccardi, L.; Palmiero, M.; Bocchi, A.; Cimadevilla, J. M.. - In: BRAIN SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3425. - 11:6(2021), p. 757. [10.3390/brainsci11060757]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Tascon_Sex Differences in Spatial Memory_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.76 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.76 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1560638
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact