In a view of a city as a living system reframing urban theories and images starting from the 20th century, regeneration is the organic metaphor with which a contemporary city was represented,1 as well as a very common term in political programmes and latest generation planning tools. The biological meaning applied to the urban environment does not only mean rebuilding spaces and renewing functions, but restoring new dignity to places for life where citizens can identify with. The concept of “urban regeneration” implies policies and intervention projects to improve abandoned, unqualified or socio-economically, spatially and environmentally degraded urban areas.2 This notion has evolved over time to meet the growing needs of an even more dynamic reality, shifting from punctual rehabilitation action within the urban fabric to integrated programmes extended to the entire urban area aimed at promoting economic activities, restoring sociality, recovering urban ecosystems.3 The purpose of regeneration is to take into account the complexity of urban habitat by encouraging development and improvement in many sectors simultaneously, so as to foster economic growth, decrease social and cultural inequity, strengthen community cohesion and social capital, minimize climate change risk.4 Such all-embracing nature of urban regeneration is also its greatest limitation: difficult challenges along with the need to satisfy multiple interests have produced partial and incongruent outcomes favouring people or business alternatively. This is why sustainability, in its various declinations, is embedded with urban regeneration policies, especially regarding the interaction of initiatives to support the city economy, living standards, climate change adaptation and mitigation. Regeneration aims to favor new urban life processes capable of generating social and economical dynamics, but mainly environmental ones: indeed, awareness and protection of the built environment form the basis of the whole concept of sustainability. However, including sustainability in the urban practice is to be supported by a significant cultural change, in the absence of which the essence of sustainability remains a mere label with no real content. Regeneration goes far beyond the objectives, aspirations, and results of urban upgrading.

Regeneration and Sustainability: a comparison of practices / Belibani, Rosalba; LEFOSSE DEBORAH, C.. - unico:21(2021), pp. 144-151. (Intervento presentato al convegno Rapid Cities – Responsive Architectures tenutosi a American University in Dubai, UAE).

Regeneration and Sustainability: a comparison of practices

BELIBANI ROSALBA
;
2021

Abstract

In a view of a city as a living system reframing urban theories and images starting from the 20th century, regeneration is the organic metaphor with which a contemporary city was represented,1 as well as a very common term in political programmes and latest generation planning tools. The biological meaning applied to the urban environment does not only mean rebuilding spaces and renewing functions, but restoring new dignity to places for life where citizens can identify with. The concept of “urban regeneration” implies policies and intervention projects to improve abandoned, unqualified or socio-economically, spatially and environmentally degraded urban areas.2 This notion has evolved over time to meet the growing needs of an even more dynamic reality, shifting from punctual rehabilitation action within the urban fabric to integrated programmes extended to the entire urban area aimed at promoting economic activities, restoring sociality, recovering urban ecosystems.3 The purpose of regeneration is to take into account the complexity of urban habitat by encouraging development and improvement in many sectors simultaneously, so as to foster economic growth, decrease social and cultural inequity, strengthen community cohesion and social capital, minimize climate change risk.4 Such all-embracing nature of urban regeneration is also its greatest limitation: difficult challenges along with the need to satisfy multiple interests have produced partial and incongruent outcomes favouring people or business alternatively. This is why sustainability, in its various declinations, is embedded with urban regeneration policies, especially regarding the interaction of initiatives to support the city economy, living standards, climate change adaptation and mitigation. Regeneration aims to favor new urban life processes capable of generating social and economical dynamics, but mainly environmental ones: indeed, awareness and protection of the built environment form the basis of the whole concept of sustainability. However, including sustainability in the urban practice is to be supported by a significant cultural change, in the absence of which the essence of sustainability remains a mere label with no real content. Regeneration goes far beyond the objectives, aspirations, and results of urban upgrading.
2021
Rapid Cities – Responsive Architectures
Regeneration; sustainability; urban theories
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Regeneration and Sustainability: a comparison of practices / Belibani, Rosalba; LEFOSSE DEBORAH, C.. - unico:21(2021), pp. 144-151. (Intervento presentato al convegno Rapid Cities – Responsive Architectures tenutosi a American University in Dubai, UAE).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Belibani_Regeneration-Sustainability_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: http://architecturemps.com/proceedings/
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.99 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.99 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1556671
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact