The starting rate for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in infants with bronchiolitis: is clinical judgment enough?

Objectives: To determine whether in infants with bronchiolitis admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) the starting rate for high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy set by the attending physicians upon clinical judgment meets patients' peak inspiratory flow (PIF) demands and how it influences respiratory mechanics and breathing effort. Methodology: We simultaneously obtained respiratory flow and esophageal pressure data from 31 young infants with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis before and after setting the HFNC rate at 1 L/kg/min (HFNC-1), 2 L/kg/min (HFNC-2) or upon clinical judgment and compared data for PIF, respiratory mechanics, and breathing effort. Results: Before HFNC oxygen therapy started, 16 (65%) infants had a PIF less than 1 L/kg/min (normal-PIF) and 15 (45%) had a PIF more than or equal to 1 L/kg/min (high-PIF). Normal-PIF-infants had higher airway resistance (p < .001) and breathing effort indexes (e.g., pressure rate product per min [PTP/min], p = .028) than high-PIF-infants. Starting the HFNC rate upon clinical judgment (1.20-2.05 L/kg/min) met all infants' PIFs. In normal-PIF-infants, the clinically judged flow rate increased PIF (p = .081) and tidal volume (p = .029), reduced airway resistance (p = .011), and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (p = .041), whereas, in both high-PIF and normal-PIF infants, it decreased respiratory rate (p < .001) and indexes of breathing effort such as PTP/min (in normal-PIF infants, p = .004; in high-PIF infants, p = .001). The 2 L/kg/min but not 1 L/kg/min rate induced similar effects. Conclusions: The wide PIF distribution in our PICU population of infants with bronchiolitis suggests two disease phenotypes whose therapeutic options might differ. An initial flow rate of nearly 2 L/kg/min meets patients' flow demands and improves respiratory mechanics and breathing effort.