The ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word is crucial for the effectiveness of semantic representation techniques. However, most existing evaluation benchmarks for assessing this criterion are tied to sense inventories (usually WordNet), restricting their usage to a small subset of knowledge-based representation techniques. The Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) addresses the dependence on sense inventories by reformulating the standard disambiguation task as a binary classification problem; but, it is limited to the English language. We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages from varied language families and with different degrees of resource availability, opening room for evaluation scenarios such as zero-shot cross-lingual transfer. We perform a series of experiments to determine the reliability of the datasets and to set performance baselines for several recent contextualized multilingual models. Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance in the task of distinguishing different meanings of a word, even for distant languages. XL-WiC is available at https://pilehvar.github.io/xlwic/.

XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization / Raganato, A., Pasini, T., Camacho-Collados, J., Pilehvar, M.T.. - (2020), pp. 7193-7206. (2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020 Online, online ) [10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.584].

XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization

Raganato, Alessandro
;
Pasini, Tommaso
;
2020

Abstract

The ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word is crucial for the effectiveness of semantic representation techniques. However, most existing evaluation benchmarks for assessing this criterion are tied to sense inventories (usually WordNet), restricting their usage to a small subset of knowledge-based representation techniques. The Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) addresses the dependence on sense inventories by reformulating the standard disambiguation task as a binary classification problem; but, it is limited to the English language. We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages from varied language families and with different degrees of resource availability, opening room for evaluation scenarios such as zero-shot cross-lingual transfer. We perform a series of experiments to determine the reliability of the datasets and to set performance baselines for several recent contextualized multilingual models. Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance in the task of distinguishing different meanings of a word, even for distant languages. XL-WiC is available at https://pilehvar.github.io/xlwic/.
2020
2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020
word sense disambiguation; neural networks; deep learning, multilinguality
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization / Raganato, A., Pasini, T., Camacho-Collados, J., Pilehvar, M.T.. - (2020), pp. 7193-7206. (2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020 Online, online ) [10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.584].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Raganato_XL-WiC_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-main.584.pdf
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 606.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
606.47 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1550435
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 55
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact