The brilliant Protestant theologian Pierre Jurieu was a proud supporter of freedom of conscience and the right of resistance against the repressive policies of Catholic France. Once he took refuge in Calvinist Holland, however, Jurieu showed himself unwilling to extend the same religious freedoms to Catholics, Protestant dissidents and atheists that he had advocated against Catholics in France. This contradictory position, which demanded freedom of conscience for his own denomination but denied it to others, caused several reactions. Among them were Pierre Bayle’s Commentaire philosophique and the Traite de la liberte de conscience of the Socinian Noel Aubert de Verse, both published in 1686–1688. The two works are very similar, and there is a dialogue between their authors. However, the Traite uses a brilliant “Spinozist” argument in favour of toleration (inspired by the Republican tradition present in Socinian political thought) that Bayle could not adopt at that time, because it would have compromised his particular pro-monarchical strategy of opposition to Jurieu. This article aims to illustrate the unexpected convergence of opposing positions on the question of toleration in the modern age.
The “hereticide”. Freedom of conscience and popular indignation in a debate around Pierre Jurieu / Benigni, F.. - In: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY REVIEW. - ISSN 1749-6977. - (2021), pp. 1-19. [10.1080/17496977.2021.1911574]
The “hereticide”. Freedom of conscience and popular indignation in a debate around Pierre Jurieu
Benigni F.
2021
Abstract
The brilliant Protestant theologian Pierre Jurieu was a proud supporter of freedom of conscience and the right of resistance against the repressive policies of Catholic France. Once he took refuge in Calvinist Holland, however, Jurieu showed himself unwilling to extend the same religious freedoms to Catholics, Protestant dissidents and atheists that he had advocated against Catholics in France. This contradictory position, which demanded freedom of conscience for his own denomination but denied it to others, caused several reactions. Among them were Pierre Bayle’s Commentaire philosophique and the Traite de la liberte de conscience of the Socinian Noel Aubert de Verse, both published in 1686–1688. The two works are very similar, and there is a dialogue between their authors. However, the Traite uses a brilliant “Spinozist” argument in favour of toleration (inspired by the Republican tradition present in Socinian political thought) that Bayle could not adopt at that time, because it would have compromised his particular pro-monarchical strategy of opposition to Jurieu. This article aims to illustrate the unexpected convergence of opposing positions on the question of toleration in the modern age.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Benigni_Hereticide_2021.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.49 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.49 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.