The brilliant Protestant theologian Pierre Jurieu was a proud supporter of freedom of conscience and the right of resistance against the repressive policies of Catholic France. Once he took refuge in Calvinist Holland, however, Jurieu showed himself unwilling to extend the same religious freedoms to Catholics, Protestant dissidents and atheists that he had advocated against Catholics in France. This contradictory position, which demanded freedom of conscience for his own denomination but denied it to others, caused several reactions. Among them were Pierre Bayle’s Commentaire philosophique and the Traite de la liberte de conscience of the Socinian Noel Aubert de Verse, both published in 1686–1688. The two works are very similar, and there is a dialogue between their authors. However, the Traite uses a brilliant “Spinozist” argument in favour of toleration (inspired by the Republican tradition present in Socinian political thought) that Bayle could not adopt at that time, because it would have compromised his particular pro-monarchical strategy of opposition to Jurieu. This article aims to illustrate the unexpected convergence of opposing positions on the question of toleration in the modern age.

The “hereticide”. Freedom of conscience and popular indignation in a debate around Pierre Jurieu / Benigni, F.. - In: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY REVIEW. - ISSN 1749-6977. - (2021), pp. 1-19. [10.1080/17496977.2021.1911574]

The “hereticide”. Freedom of conscience and popular indignation in a debate around Pierre Jurieu

Benigni F.
2021

Abstract

The brilliant Protestant theologian Pierre Jurieu was a proud supporter of freedom of conscience and the right of resistance against the repressive policies of Catholic France. Once he took refuge in Calvinist Holland, however, Jurieu showed himself unwilling to extend the same religious freedoms to Catholics, Protestant dissidents and atheists that he had advocated against Catholics in France. This contradictory position, which demanded freedom of conscience for his own denomination but denied it to others, caused several reactions. Among them were Pierre Bayle’s Commentaire philosophique and the Traite de la liberte de conscience of the Socinian Noel Aubert de Verse, both published in 1686–1688. The two works are very similar, and there is a dialogue between their authors. However, the Traite uses a brilliant “Spinozist” argument in favour of toleration (inspired by the Republican tradition present in Socinian political thought) that Bayle could not adopt at that time, because it would have compromised his particular pro-monarchical strategy of opposition to Jurieu. This article aims to illustrate the unexpected convergence of opposing positions on the question of toleration in the modern age.
2021
Bayle; Jurieu; right of resistance; Socinianism; Spinoza; tolerance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The “hereticide”. Freedom of conscience and popular indignation in a debate around Pierre Jurieu / Benigni, F.. - In: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY REVIEW. - ISSN 1749-6977. - (2021), pp. 1-19. [10.1080/17496977.2021.1911574]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Benigni_Hereticide_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.49 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1550265
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact