Background: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, since March 2020, the Italian population was forced into lockdown to prevent the spread of the virus. The restrictive measures imposed forced many organizations and workers to work through online platforms and no longer in-person. Smart working, enjoyed by some workers for its flexibility, affected several professional categories. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in the psychological variables related to four groups of professional categories (practitioners, managers, executive employees, teachers), particularly the teachers group. Methods: A total sample of 628 individuals was recruited through a random probability sample across Italy. Due to the lockdown, an online questionnaire was developed; several validated scales were chosen, and some ad hoc constructed items related to the smart working experience were included. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between the four groups of examined smart workers. Conclusions: All workers have had to readjust to this new way of working, but our results show that teachers were the most affected, both in the perception of their psychological well-being and in the management of the smart working mode.

Teaching during the pandemic: a comparison in psychological wellbeing among smart working professions / Mari, Emanuela; Lausi, Giulia; Fraschetti, Angelo; Pizzo, Alessandra; Baldi, Michela; Quaglieri, Alessandro; Burrai, Jessica; Barchielli, Benedetta; Avallone, Francesco; Giannini, Anna Maria. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 13:9(2021). [10.3390/su13094850]

Teaching during the pandemic: a comparison in psychological wellbeing among smart working professions

Mari, Emanuela
;
Lausi, Giulia;Fraschetti, Angelo;Pizzo, Alessandra;Baldi, Michela;Quaglieri, Alessandro;Burrai, Jessica;Barchielli, Benedetta;Avallone, Francesco;Giannini, Anna Maria
2021

Abstract

Background: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, since March 2020, the Italian population was forced into lockdown to prevent the spread of the virus. The restrictive measures imposed forced many organizations and workers to work through online platforms and no longer in-person. Smart working, enjoyed by some workers for its flexibility, affected several professional categories. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in the psychological variables related to four groups of professional categories (practitioners, managers, executive employees, teachers), particularly the teachers group. Methods: A total sample of 628 individuals was recruited through a random probability sample across Italy. Due to the lockdown, an online questionnaire was developed; several validated scales were chosen, and some ad hoc constructed items related to the smart working experience were included. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between the four groups of examined smart workers. Conclusions: All workers have had to readjust to this new way of working, but our results show that teachers were the most affected, both in the perception of their psychological well-being and in the management of the smart working mode.
2021
coronavirus; psychological factor; remote working; coping strategies; stress; job shift; COVID-19
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Teaching during the pandemic: a comparison in psychological wellbeing among smart working professions / Mari, Emanuela; Lausi, Giulia; Fraschetti, Angelo; Pizzo, Alessandra; Baldi, Michela; Quaglieri, Alessandro; Burrai, Jessica; Barchielli, Benedetta; Avallone, Francesco; Giannini, Anna Maria. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 13:9(2021). [10.3390/su13094850]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mari_Smart-working-professions_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 286.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286.56 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1547488
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact