Introduction: Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant. Patients and methods: We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax®) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H®). Results: During first month, 45% of Daclizumab recipients experienced six acute cellular rejections (ACRs) of mild degree, while 63% of them developed an infection requiring treatment. We found three acute cellular rejections in 17.6% of Alemtuzumab recipients, two with moderate degree; 64.7% of them required treatment for infection. Discussion and conclusions: Graft and patient 3-years cumulative survival rate were not significantly different between groups. Alemtuzumab seems to offer a better immunosuppression during first month. © 2006 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.

Daclizumab and Alemtuzumab as induction agents in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. A comparison of two different regimens on 29 recipients during the early post-operative period / Lauro, A.; Amaduzzi, A.; Dazzi, A.; Ercolani, G.; Zanfi, C.; Golfieri, L.; Grazi, G. L.; Vivarelli, M.; Cescon, M.; Varotti, G.; Del Gaudio, M.; Ravaioli, M.; Siniscalchi, A.; Faenza, S.; D'Errico, A.; Di Simone, M.; Pironi, L.; Pinna, A. D.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 39:3(2007), pp. 253-256. [10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.012]

Daclizumab and Alemtuzumab as induction agents in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. A comparison of two different regimens on 29 recipients during the early post-operative period

Lauro A.
Primo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2007

Abstract

Introduction: Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant. Patients and methods: We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax®) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H®). Results: During first month, 45% of Daclizumab recipients experienced six acute cellular rejections (ACRs) of mild degree, while 63% of them developed an infection requiring treatment. We found three acute cellular rejections in 17.6% of Alemtuzumab recipients, two with moderate degree; 64.7% of them required treatment for infection. Discussion and conclusions: Graft and patient 3-years cumulative survival rate were not significantly different between groups. Alemtuzumab seems to offer a better immunosuppression during first month. © 2006 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
2007
Alemtuzumab; Daclizumab; Immunosuppression; Induction therapy; Adult; Alemtuzumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antibodies, Neoplasm; Daclizumab; Female; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunosuppressive Agents; Intestines; Male; Postoperative Period; Transplantation, Homologous; Viscera
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Daclizumab and Alemtuzumab as induction agents in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. A comparison of two different regimens on 29 recipients during the early post-operative period / Lauro, A.; Amaduzzi, A.; Dazzi, A.; Ercolani, G.; Zanfi, C.; Golfieri, L.; Grazi, G. L.; Vivarelli, M.; Cescon, M.; Varotti, G.; Del Gaudio, M.; Ravaioli, M.; Siniscalchi, A.; Faenza, S.; D'Errico, A.; Di Simone, M.; Pironi, L.; Pinna, A. D.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 39:3(2007), pp. 253-256. [10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.012]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lauro_Daclizumab-Alemtuzumab_2007.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 212.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
212.08 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1547183
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact