The treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction represents one of the major interesting aspects in urological clinical practice. Although transurethral resection of the prostate is still considered the surgical gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate volume <80 mL, various minimally invasive surgical treatments (MITs) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the "conventional" surgery. To date, there are no validated tools to evaluate the surgical outcomes of MITs; however, in the past, BPH-6 has been used for this purpose. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MITs according to BPH-6 score system. We focused our attention on MITs based on mechanical devices (prostatic urethral lift and the temporary implantable nitinol device) and techniques for prostate ablation (image guided robotic waterjet ablation and convective water vapor energy ablation). Evidence shows that MITs are capable of leading to an improvement in LUTS without having an overwhelming impact on complications and are a valid alternative to other treatments in patients who wish to preserve their sexual function or in case of inapplicability of conventional surgery. However, comparative studies between these techniques are still missing.
Mechanical and Ablative Minimally Invasive Techniques for Male LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. A Systematic Review according to BPH-6 Evaluation / Cantiello, Francesco; Fimognari, Deborah; Di Mauro, Marina; Crocerossa, Fabio; Carbonara, Umberto; Ferro, Matteo; De Cobelli, Ottavio; Lucarelli, Giuseppe; De Nunzio, Cosimo; Morgia, Giuseppe; Damiano, Rocco; Autorino, Riccardo; Porpiglia, Francesco; Russo, Giorgio Ivan. - In: UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS. - ISSN 0042-1138. - Apr 13(2021), pp. 1-11. [10.1159/000514438]
Mechanical and Ablative Minimally Invasive Techniques for Male LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. A Systematic Review according to BPH-6 Evaluation
De Nunzio, Cosimo;
2021
Abstract
The treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction represents one of the major interesting aspects in urological clinical practice. Although transurethral resection of the prostate is still considered the surgical gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate volume <80 mL, various minimally invasive surgical treatments (MITs) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the "conventional" surgery. To date, there are no validated tools to evaluate the surgical outcomes of MITs; however, in the past, BPH-6 has been used for this purpose. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MITs according to BPH-6 score system. We focused our attention on MITs based on mechanical devices (prostatic urethral lift and the temporary implantable nitinol device) and techniques for prostate ablation (image guided robotic waterjet ablation and convective water vapor energy ablation). Evidence shows that MITs are capable of leading to an improvement in LUTS without having an overwhelming impact on complications and are a valid alternative to other treatments in patients who wish to preserve their sexual function or in case of inapplicability of conventional surgery. However, comparative studies between these techniques are still missing.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cantiello_Mechanical_2021.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
5.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.1 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.