• STRENGTH,1 an industry-sponsored, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial investigated the effects of a carboxylic acid (CA) formulation of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (omega-3 CA) vs. corn oil in 13 078 participants with high cardiovascular (CV) risk, hypertriglyceridaemia, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. • Eligible patients were randomized to receive 4 g/day of omega-3 CA or corn oil in addition to standard preventive therapies, including statins (high-intensity in 50%), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers (in 81%), and antiplatelet agents (in 71%). • The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The trial required adjudication of 1600 primary events to provide 90% power to detect a 15% relative risk reduction in the omega-3 CA group. • After a median follow-up of 42 months, omega-3 CA did not reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint compared to corn oil [hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–1.09; P ¼ 0.84]. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups with regard to the risk of individual components of the primary endpoint nor in a number of secondary endpoints. • The incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events was greater among patients treated with omega-3 CA than with corn oil (24.7% vs. 14.7%). A higher rate of investigator-reported new-onset atrial fibrillation was observed with the use of omega-3 CA than corn-oil (2.2% vs. 1.3%; nominal P < 0.001)

The observation of lower rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in populations that consumed large amount of foods rich in very-longchain polyunsaturated fatty acids (FA) containing omega-3 FA triggered interest in assessing whether supplementation of omega-3 FA may be cardioprotective. During the past 20 years, at least 14 RCTs in over 132 000 participants, mostly at high CV risk, have assessed the efficacy and safety of long-term omega-3 FA supplementation for CV prevention

The REDUCE-IT verdict on eicosapentaenoic acid and cardiovascular outcome challenged with STRENGTH / Volpe, M.; Patrono, C.. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. - ISSN 0195-668X. - 41:12(2021), pp. 1225-1227. [10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1042]

The REDUCE-IT verdict on eicosapentaenoic acid and cardiovascular outcome challenged with STRENGTH

Volpe M.;Patrono C.
2021

Abstract

• STRENGTH,1 an industry-sponsored, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial investigated the effects of a carboxylic acid (CA) formulation of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (omega-3 CA) vs. corn oil in 13 078 participants with high cardiovascular (CV) risk, hypertriglyceridaemia, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. • Eligible patients were randomized to receive 4 g/day of omega-3 CA or corn oil in addition to standard preventive therapies, including statins (high-intensity in 50%), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers (in 81%), and antiplatelet agents (in 71%). • The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The trial required adjudication of 1600 primary events to provide 90% power to detect a 15% relative risk reduction in the omega-3 CA group. • After a median follow-up of 42 months, omega-3 CA did not reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint compared to corn oil [hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–1.09; P ¼ 0.84]. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups with regard to the risk of individual components of the primary endpoint nor in a number of secondary endpoints. • The incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events was greater among patients treated with omega-3 CA than with corn oil (24.7% vs. 14.7%). A higher rate of investigator-reported new-onset atrial fibrillation was observed with the use of omega-3 CA than corn-oil (2.2% vs. 1.3%; nominal P < 0.001)
2021
The observation of lower rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in populations that consumed large amount of foods rich in very-longchain polyunsaturated fatty acids (FA) containing omega-3 FA triggered interest in assessing whether supplementation of omega-3 FA may be cardioprotective. During the past 20 years, at least 14 RCTs in over 132 000 participants, mostly at high CV risk, have assessed the efficacy and safety of long-term omega-3 FA supplementation for CV prevention
dyslipidemia; cardiovascular risk; omega-3 FA
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01b Commento, Erratum, Replica e simili
The REDUCE-IT verdict on eicosapentaenoic acid and cardiovascular outcome challenged with STRENGTH / Volpe, M.; Patrono, C.. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. - ISSN 0195-668X. - 41:12(2021), pp. 1225-1227. [10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1042]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Volpe_The-REDUCE-IT_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 253.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
253.93 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore
Volpe_The-REDUCE-IT_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 253.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
253.8 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1542079
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact