A well-known problem of the Euclidean distance is that it is not always appropriate to explore the multivariate structure of community composition. This is because all distances of the ‘Euclidean family’ may lead to the paradoxical condition for which two samples with no species in common may be more similar than two samples with the same species list. This effect is generally known as the Orlóci paradox. To avoid this problem, some kind of data normalization has to be performed. Therefore, the main question of this short paper is: what is gained and what is lost by moving from the Euclidean distance to compositional dissimilarity? To answer this question, I first explore the causes of the Orlóci paradox. Next, I discuss how the normalization methods that are included in virtually all compositional dissimilarity measures affect the way in which species abundances are modeled.

From the euclidean distance to compositional dissimilarity. What is gained and what is lost / Ricotta, Carlo. - In: ACTA OECOLOGICA. - ISSN 1146-609X. - 111:(2021). [10.1016/j.actao.2021.103732]

From the euclidean distance to compositional dissimilarity. What is gained and what is lost

Ricotta, Carlo
2021

Abstract

A well-known problem of the Euclidean distance is that it is not always appropriate to explore the multivariate structure of community composition. This is because all distances of the ‘Euclidean family’ may lead to the paradoxical condition for which two samples with no species in common may be more similar than two samples with the same species list. This effect is generally known as the Orlóci paradox. To avoid this problem, some kind of data normalization has to be performed. Therefore, the main question of this short paper is: what is gained and what is lost by moving from the Euclidean distance to compositional dissimilarity? To answer this question, I first explore the causes of the Orlóci paradox. Next, I discuss how the normalization methods that are included in virtually all compositional dissimilarity measures affect the way in which species abundances are modeled.
2021
data transformation; monotonicity to changes in species abundances; Orlóci's paradox; species relative abundances; translational invariance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
From the euclidean distance to compositional dissimilarity. What is gained and what is lost / Ricotta, Carlo. - In: ACTA OECOLOGICA. - ISSN 1146-609X. - 111:(2021). [10.1016/j.actao.2021.103732]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ricotta_From-the-euclidean_ 2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 351.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
351.29 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1540822
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact