Introduction: Intestinal transplantation has become an accepted therapy for individuals permanently dependent on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with life-threatening complications. Quality of life and psychological well-being can be seen as important outcome measures of transplantation surgery. Methods: We evaluated 24 adult intestinal transplant recipients and 24 healthy subjects (a control group). All subjects were administered the Italian Version of the Psychological Well-Being Scales (PWB) by C. Ryff, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL), and the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) by R. Kellner and G.A. Fava, a symptomatology scale. Quality of life and psychological well-being were assessed in transplant recipients in relationship to the number of rejections, the number of admissions, and the immunosuppressive protocol. Results: Intestinal transplant recipients reported significantly higher scores in the "personal growth" category (P = .036) and lower scores in the "positive relation with others" (P = .013) and "autonomy" (P = .007) dimensions of PWB, compared with the controls. In the WHOQOL, the scores of transplant recipients were lower only in the psychological domain (P = .011). Transplant recipients reported significantly higher scores in the "somatic symptom" (P = .027) and "hostility" (P = .018) dimensions of the SQ, compared with the controls. Transplant recipients with number of admissions >8 reported higher scores in "anxiety" (P = .019) and "depression" (P = .021) scales of the SQ, and the patients with a Daclizumab protocol reported higher scores in "depression" (P = .000) and "somatic symptom" (P = .008) of the SQ. There were no significant differences regarding number of rejections and socio-demographic variables. Conclusion: Improvement of psychological well-being in the transplant population may be related to the achievement of the goal of transplantation: recovery of bowel function. But the data confirmed that the transplant experience required a long and difficult adaptation trial to the new condition of "transplant recipient."

Psychological adaptation and quality of life of adult intestinal transplant recipients: University of Bologna experience / Golfieri, L; Lauro, A; Tossani, E; Sirri, L; Venturoli, A; Dazzi, A; Zanfi, C; Zanello, M; Vetrone, G; Cucchetti, A; Ercolani, G; Vivarelli, M; Del Gaudio, M; Ravaioli, M; Cescon, M; Grazi, Gl; Faenza, S; Grandi, S; Pinna, Ad.. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - 42:1(2010), pp. 42-44. ( 11th International Symposium on Small Bowel Transplantation Bologna ) [10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.021].

Psychological adaptation and quality of life of adult intestinal transplant recipients: University of Bologna experience

LAURO A
Secondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2010

Abstract

Introduction: Intestinal transplantation has become an accepted therapy for individuals permanently dependent on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with life-threatening complications. Quality of life and psychological well-being can be seen as important outcome measures of transplantation surgery. Methods: We evaluated 24 adult intestinal transplant recipients and 24 healthy subjects (a control group). All subjects were administered the Italian Version of the Psychological Well-Being Scales (PWB) by C. Ryff, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL), and the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) by R. Kellner and G.A. Fava, a symptomatology scale. Quality of life and psychological well-being were assessed in transplant recipients in relationship to the number of rejections, the number of admissions, and the immunosuppressive protocol. Results: Intestinal transplant recipients reported significantly higher scores in the "personal growth" category (P = .036) and lower scores in the "positive relation with others" (P = .013) and "autonomy" (P = .007) dimensions of PWB, compared with the controls. In the WHOQOL, the scores of transplant recipients were lower only in the psychological domain (P = .011). Transplant recipients reported significantly higher scores in the "somatic symptom" (P = .027) and "hostility" (P = .018) dimensions of the SQ, compared with the controls. Transplant recipients with number of admissions >8 reported higher scores in "anxiety" (P = .019) and "depression" (P = .021) scales of the SQ, and the patients with a Daclizumab protocol reported higher scores in "depression" (P = .000) and "somatic symptom" (P = .008) of the SQ. There were no significant differences regarding number of rejections and socio-demographic variables. Conclusion: Improvement of psychological well-being in the transplant population may be related to the achievement of the goal of transplantation: recovery of bowel function. But the data confirmed that the transplant experience required a long and difficult adaptation trial to the new condition of "transplant recipient."
2010
11th International Symposium on Small Bowel Transplantation
No key words available
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
Psychological adaptation and quality of life of adult intestinal transplant recipients: University of Bologna experience / Golfieri, L; Lauro, A; Tossani, E; Sirri, L; Venturoli, A; Dazzi, A; Zanfi, C; Zanello, M; Vetrone, G; Cucchetti, A; Ercolani, G; Vivarelli, M; Del Gaudio, M; Ravaioli, M; Cescon, M; Grazi, Gl; Faenza, S; Grandi, S; Pinna, Ad.. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - 42:1(2010), pp. 42-44. ( 11th International Symposium on Small Bowel Transplantation Bologna ) [10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.021].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Golfieri_Psychology-transplant-recipients_2010.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 102.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
102.34 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1530827
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact