Grounded in social representation theory and its empirical investigation into the ‘social arena’, inspired by the ‘modelling paradigmatic approach’, the research presented in this article is part of a larger project aimed at reconstructing the ‘multi- voice’, and ‘multi-agent’ discourse about (im)migration. Specifically, this contribu- tion’s focus is on the exploration of shaping and sharing social representations about (im)migrants through communication via the social medium ‘Twitter’. A total of 1,958 tweets (967 Italian and 991 English tweets) were analysed through Systeme Portable Pour L’Analyse Des Donnees Textuelles [Portable System for Textual Data Analysis]SPAD in two lexical correspondence analyses. The results show a dichotom- ous discourse organising a semantic space structured around five different factors for the two distinct Twitter corpora: both clearly show polarised social representa- tions of ‘immigrants–migrants’, leading to exclusion–inclusion policies depending on the discursive agent’s ideological affiliation in the Italian and the international polit- ical frame. Used as a propaganda tool, Twitter echoes the related pro- and anti- immigration polemical representations of opposite political leaders in posts that are positioned differently in relation to the progressive/conservative ideology.

Twitter as social media arena for polarised social representations about the (im)migration: The controversial discourse in the Italian and international political frame / de Rosa, Annamaria Silvana; Bocci, Elena; Bonito, Mattia; Salvati, Marco. - In: MIGRATION STUDIES. - ISSN 2049-5838. - (2021). [10.1093/migration/mnab001]

Twitter as social media arena for polarised social representations about the (im)migration: The controversial discourse in the Italian and international political frame

de Rosa, Annamaria Silvana
;
Bocci, Elena;Salvati, Marco
2021

Abstract

Grounded in social representation theory and its empirical investigation into the ‘social arena’, inspired by the ‘modelling paradigmatic approach’, the research presented in this article is part of a larger project aimed at reconstructing the ‘multi- voice’, and ‘multi-agent’ discourse about (im)migration. Specifically, this contribu- tion’s focus is on the exploration of shaping and sharing social representations about (im)migrants through communication via the social medium ‘Twitter’. A total of 1,958 tweets (967 Italian and 991 English tweets) were analysed through Systeme Portable Pour L’Analyse Des Donnees Textuelles [Portable System for Textual Data Analysis]SPAD in two lexical correspondence analyses. The results show a dichotom- ous discourse organising a semantic space structured around five different factors for the two distinct Twitter corpora: both clearly show polarised social representa- tions of ‘immigrants–migrants’, leading to exclusion–inclusion policies depending on the discursive agent’s ideological affiliation in the Italian and the international polit- ical frame. Used as a propaganda tool, Twitter echoes the related pro- and anti- immigration polemical representations of opposite political leaders in posts that are positioned differently in relation to the progressive/conservative ideology.
2021
social representations; (im)migrants; social media; Twitter; multi-agent discourse; geo-political positioning
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Twitter as social media arena for polarised social representations about the (im)migration: The controversial discourse in the Italian and international political frame / de Rosa, Annamaria Silvana; Bocci, Elena; Bonito, Mattia; Salvati, Marco. - In: MIGRATION STUDIES. - ISSN 2049-5838. - (2021). [10.1093/migration/mnab001]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1517996
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact