This article mainly focuses on Sextus Empiricus’ only evidence (M. 7,201 = Antioc. Ascal. 66 Luck = F2 Mette = F2 Sedley) for Antiochus’ of Ascalon Kanonika. David Sedley maintains that Antiochus wrote his Kanonika before the ‘publication’ in 87 BC of the so-called Roman Books by his master Philo of Larissa. Accordingly, the Kanonika do not include any criticism against the Sceptics of the Academy. The close examination of Sextus’ testimony shows that in all likelihood behind Antiochus’ quotation lies a precise philosophical strategy against the Sceptics of the Academy who accused Antiochus’ epistemological criterion of self-evidence (enargeia / perspicuitas / evidentia) of being an Epicurean one. From this point of view, the (likely) mention of the physician Asclepiades of Bithynia by Antiochus in the same passage of Sextus Empiricus could be plausibly interpreted as Antiochus’ defense against the charge of Epicureanism. Therefore, the possibility that the Kanonika were written after Philo’s Roman Books cannot be ruled out.

I "Kanonika" di Antioco di Ascalona e Asclepiade di Bitinia (Sext. Emp. M. 7, 200-202) / Verde, F.. - In: RHEINISCHES MUSEUM FÜR PHILOLOGIE. - ISSN 0035-449X. - 163(2020):(2020), pp. 241-270.

I "Kanonika" di Antioco di Ascalona e Asclepiade di Bitinia (Sext. Emp. M. 7, 200-202)

VERDE F.
2020

Abstract

This article mainly focuses on Sextus Empiricus’ only evidence (M. 7,201 = Antioc. Ascal. 66 Luck = F2 Mette = F2 Sedley) for Antiochus’ of Ascalon Kanonika. David Sedley maintains that Antiochus wrote his Kanonika before the ‘publication’ in 87 BC of the so-called Roman Books by his master Philo of Larissa. Accordingly, the Kanonika do not include any criticism against the Sceptics of the Academy. The close examination of Sextus’ testimony shows that in all likelihood behind Antiochus’ quotation lies a precise philosophical strategy against the Sceptics of the Academy who accused Antiochus’ epistemological criterion of self-evidence (enargeia / perspicuitas / evidentia) of being an Epicurean one. From this point of view, the (likely) mention of the physician Asclepiades of Bithynia by Antiochus in the same passage of Sextus Empiricus could be plausibly interpreted as Antiochus’ defense against the charge of Epicureanism. Therefore, the possibility that the Kanonika were written after Philo’s Roman Books cannot be ruled out.
2020
Antiochus of Ascalon; Asclepiades of Bithynia; Kanonika; Epicureanism; Academic Scepticism
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
I "Kanonika" di Antioco di Ascalona e Asclepiade di Bitinia (Sext. Emp. M. 7, 200-202) / Verde, F.. - In: RHEINISCHES MUSEUM FÜR PHILOLOGIE. - ISSN 0035-449X. - 163(2020):(2020), pp. 241-270.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Verde_Kanonika_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 648.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
648.34 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1511204
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact